Cameron: he was against paternity pay before he was in favour of it. What will his view be next month?

‘Dads will be able to take up to six months’ paternity leave while their child’s mother returns to work, under government plans announced today,’ reports The Guardian.

The Lib Dems’ shadow children, schools and families secretary, David Laws, is deeply unimpressed with Labour’s approach:

The Government fails to understand that all families are different and need far more flexibility when it comes to parental leave. Labour seems to think it knows best when it comes to how families should arrange their lives.
 
“Instead of more rigid and complex reforms, the Liberal Democrats would introduce fully flexible parental leave which can be shared between parents as they see fit. Giving both parents meaningful time to spend with their newborn child will help families to bond and enjoy valuable time together.”

As David states, Lib Dem policy on parental leave is all in favour of flexibility for the couple concerned:

Liberal Democrats would replace maternity leave with parental leave, which could be shared between parents, and would increase this to nineteen months, to enable both parents have the full opportunity to help provide care for their babies. While mothers will obviously need to take some parental leave around the time of the birth, the remaining time could be taken by either parent, subject to neither parent taking more than one year. This would enable both parents to take at least seven months off if the full entitlement was taken up, with the precise amount of time taken by each parent to be a matter of choice for the family.

But what of David Cameron’s Tories? Well, as so often, it’s a little hard to say.

On the one hand, you have Theresa May for the Tories accusing Labour of acting “too little, too late” on the issue.

Yet her leader, Mr Cameron, is on the record attacking the idea of any big increase in paid paternity leave, telling The Sunday Times:

The suggestion for the massive extension of paternity leave owes a bit more to political correctness than the realities of life. It could be very disruptive, particularly to small business.”

And back in 2001, the Tory leader voted against introducing paternity pay as part of the second reading of the Employment Bill.

Who knows what position the Tory leader and the rest of his party will adopt once the election’s safely out of the way?

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarWilliam 26th Jan - 3:48pm
    Sorry, but something is wrong in this list. For example, you have Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey, but we're 3rd there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverness,_Nairn,_Badenoch_and_Strathspey_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2010s The same is...
  • User AvatarJames Pugh 26th Jan - 2:44pm
    I agree with Hywel, this is very welcome and a core Liberal issue (that just doesn't resonate with the Labour or Conservative party machines). It's...
  • User AvatarHywel 26th Jan - 2:05pm
    This is excellent. The failure to speak out on this before - coupled with Vince abandoning any talk of civil liberties issues - was a...
  • User AvatarHywel 26th Jan - 2:03pm
    "Sadly, the one thing HS2 will not do is help small towns. " It will though. The big thing HS2 brings is extra capacity and...
  • User AvatarPeter Hirst 26th Jan - 1:00pm
    Just because revoking did not win votes, does not necessarily mean it was a bad policy. It might have cemented our core vote. It was...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 26th Jan - 12:39pm
    "It may raise a few more eyebrows to hear that {Prof John Curtice} thinks that the party’s stance on stopping Brexit did not cost it...