Caroline Pidgeon Tackling road safety by helping vulnerable road users

Just one per cent of traffic, but twenty-one per cent of fatalities. A shocking statement. This is the reality of motorcycling on our roads. This underpins the danger of being a motorcyclist on Britain’s roads. It is a disparity that shows no sign of diminishing nor, unfortunately, being addressed by government.

The Government’s recent Road Safety Strategy is broadly welcome. While one of the measures in the Road Safety Strategy will help motorcyclist safety, namely increased funding for combatting the scourge of potholes on Britain’s roads, there is little else that is new or transformative for motorcyclists, one of the most vulnerable groups of road users.

The Strategy discusses how “Legislative changes introduced to improve safety for motorcyclists have resulted in a complex motorcycle training, testing and licensing regime, with motorcyclists remaining at greater risk of KSIs than many other road users.” But the actions to make things safer are limited.

The main thrust of the government’s plans is that it will be consulting on changes to the training, testing and licensing regime for motorcyclists. Whilst this is very welcome, and something I have had concerns about for some time, especially with the increase in delivery drivers, more is needed.

In some ways, the government acknowledges the dire statistics on road safety for motorcyclists. Then they explain how, thus far, the main safety changes that successive governments have introduced have done very little to affect motorcyclist safety. The follow up is to then announce that they will do more of the same tinkering around the rules.

Meanwhile, the same Road Safety Strategy introduced plans for 18 new mandatory technologies for cars and other powered four-wheel vehicles. This is a clear example of how, for most motorists, the new Road Safety Strategy is very good. There is plenty to celebrate. But this only makes the difference in treatment that much harder to accept.

It is a glaring hole in the strategy. Motorcyclists, by the nature of a motorbike, are more vulnerable and yet the government appears to not want to embrace any potential safety advancements.

Since 2018, all new cars have been hooked up the eCall programme, a national programme for crash detection. However, despite motorcyclists being far more vulnerable in crashes there is no equivalent system even being considered by the government. This is a missed opportunity in the strategy.

Despite motorcyclists being far more vulnerable in crashes and thus the potential benefits of quick response times being more beneficial for motorcyclists, there is simply no movement. The government is aware of motorcycle crash detection options but in answering questions in Parliament, they publicly admit to having made no assessment of its potential and having no interest in expanding its crash detection services.

Motorcyclists deserve better than this double standard. There is no reason for government to continue to refuse to even countenance exploring crash detection options for motorcyclists. Having serious conversations with those currently offering crash detection services would be a good start. Our roads need to be safer for all road users. And that must include motorcyclists.

* Baroness Caroline Pidgeon is a Liberal Democrat member of the House of Lords and was London Assembly Member from 2008-2024 and and London Mayoral Candidate 2016.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Hirst
    Burning fossil fuels to fund renewables is a tempting suggestion. What messaging does it send out? It might appeal to everyone or noone. I suppose the devil is ...
  • Peter Hirst
    Communities in political terms usually exist around a local issue that can form a community where none existed. I remember the proposal to construct an incinera...
  • Jana
    @Mick Taylor “ OK, so what services are you going to cut to get taxes down?” A fair question. I would suggest that we can reduce taxes on income by incr...
  • Tristan Ward
    I recall my mother (a Lib Dem Councillor in the 1980s and 90s on Kent CC when we ran that council commenting that all the Tories were frightened to death of the...
  • Peter Davies
    Yes. Cryptocurrency is not currency and should be treated as a speculative asset. In order to apply CGT, you should be required to register all crypto holdings....