Clegg and Farron champion green issues after Cameron appears to backtrack

Of course he hasn’t said this publicly, but the Telegraph reports that David Cameron has stated privately that he wants to “get rid of all the green crap” from Coalition policies.

Nick Clegg and Tim Farron are both quoted as robustly defending green measures and the jobs they create. Nick says that he doesn’t think the headlines portray David Cameron’s views.

On Call Clegg, Nick said:

Well, if I may use the word, it isn’t all crap, of course. It is worth remembering that a lot of the policies that we’ve got support tens of thousands of people who work in a booming green energy sector actually keep bills down in the long run because if you don’t insulate people’s homes today, they’re going to be spending more on their gas and electricity bills in the future and heating their homes. And crucially, some of these policies are there to help the most vulnerable. I’ll give you an example. One of these levies called the Warm Homes Discount will pay for sending out a check worth £135 to two million of the poorest households in this country. Now, by the way, the Prime Minister and I, funnily enough, were discussing this just yesterday. So it so happens, I don’t think that’s a fair reflection of his views. We both want to see policies where we are in control of them in government made as cost effective as possible without cutting our commitment to reducing carbon emissions and looking after the environment. So of course we’re going to try and reduce the cost of them and we’re looking at different options of doing that but we’re not going to abandon the long term objective of making sure that we reinvest all of our energy infrastructure to keep the lights on, make sure that we continue to support a green energy sector which is employing thousands upon thousands of people in this country and keep it…

And the solution is for the Government to pay for the investment in green technology rather than the consumer:

If you really want to snatch up that £135 cheque away from a million poor pensioners in this country, be my guest and try and make that sound popular or indeed, another million households. But what we can do, and of course we’re looking at this, is we can simply say, “Okay, well pay for that, not from your bills but the government will pay for it.” So we’re looking at all these options to make sure that we reduce wherever we can the burden on people’s bills whilst keeping in place the objectives of these policies

Tim Farron had no intention of giving David Cameron the benefit of any doubt, telling the Sun:

The ‘green c**p’, as the Tories call it, are the funds that pay for insulating the homes of elderly people and which support thousands of British manufacturing jobs.

This is depressingly cynical – only bothering about political spin, not in protecting our children’s future.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Stephen Hesketh 21st Nov '13 - 9:35pm

    Long term forecasts are for energy prices being set to rise for the foreseeable future. One has to wonder by how much we could cut UK domestic energy consumption if the media (print in particular) spent a little more time on the positive things we could do as opposed to the continuing flood of negative stories. Setting aside the morals of the situation, using less energy must be the most cost effective things we can do in the longer term. Some of the possible results of global warming could make our failure to pay a few pounds on our bills to help fund green crap for the future are the stuff of nightmares. Once again the Tories reveal themselves to be occupying those darker recesses of the political scene where even enlightened self interest fails to have any influence. Well done Tim and Nick..

  • Tubby Isaacs 7th Dec '13 - 12:06am

    Well, this brave rearguard lasted all of 5 minutes.

    Anyone going to defend Clegg and Davey?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 30th May - 4:19am
    George Kendall But they didn't all have extensive lockdowns. Maybe testing actually reduces mortality figures by demonstrating that the virus is simply not as lethal...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 30th May - 3:02am
    @Glenn (1/2) Thanks for the reply. I know a few experts share your opinion. Most don't, but that doesn't make you wrong. For me, I'm...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 30th May - 2:26am
    This article asks the readers of LDV some questions: Do our five current proposed social ills cover all the social ills we as a party...
  • User AvatarGlenn 30th May - 12:35am
    George Kendall I disagree. There is growing evidence that at best there is very little difference between countries that adopted lockdowns than those that didn't....
  • User AvatarManfarang 29th May - 11:43pm
    I will always remember organising jumble sales. The amount of good stuff people would throw away.
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 29th May - 11:37pm
    David Raw, it is true you can’t tell Brentford supporters anything, not even other Brentford supporters can. The recent Libdem manifesto would see public spending...