[email protected]: Nick Clegg – It’s time for a truly different banking system

Over at the Yorkshire Post, Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg argues that, after a decade when British banks have been allowed to get away with far too much, it’s high time for real reform of the banking industry. Here’s an excerpt:

I want a return to old-style high street banks so people’s savings are protected from bankers who are obsessed with taking high risk gambles with other people’s money. I propose that banks are given a choice: they can do ordinary consumer business like current accounts, mortgages, business loans, savings, they can even make sensible low-risk investments and we will protect them and their customers’ money if things go wrong, but in return, we will regulate them like a hawk.

The alternative that some banks may prefer is to take the high-risk route, playing the markets to get big returns. But if they do this we will regulate them and keep them small so that they can’t put whole markets at risk. If things go wrong, we would let them fail.

… if anyone’s ever going to trust Britain’s banks again, those responsible for this crisis need to be brought to account. They may not be criminals, but they failed. The companies they ran had to crawl to the taxpayer for a multi-billion pound bailout, and in my book that’s failure. But what’s staggering is that none of them have been held to account for what they did.

When Barings Bank went belly-up in 1995, the Government banned 10 directors from working in any other boardroom. This time, when the whole banking system has been torn to pieces, not one person has been disqualified.

No wonder people have lost faith in a banking system in which the most basic standards of accountability have been forgotten. I believe we should disqualify these bankers right now, and have launched a petition at www.disqualifythem.org to get the Government to do it.

You can read the article in full HERE.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • Andrew Duffield 19th Mar '09 - 1:57pm

    Dear Nick

    All we need is for the Bank of England to be sole issuer of sterling, lending to banks at base rate and ending private appropriation of such public wealth.

    The revenue raised should replace the taxes that rich corporations and individuals now avoid, without massive state regulation and costly policing.

    By removing barriers (mainly regulatory) to other organisations wishing to offer banking services, no bank would be “too big to fail” and state bailouts could be consigned to history.

    A Liberal banking system would automatically incentivise equity investment for capital returns (rather than rent-seeking, unearned usury) – and would do so without state interference.

    If you want a populist line that would really deliver “a return to old-style banking”, vastly more sustainable government finances and less risks for the public purse, try a campaign/petition for the re-nationalisation of sterling.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • James Brough
    Excellent article. As Mary says, it's just a shame that it needed to be written. Somehow, it seems to have become a worse crime to accuse someone of intolerance...
  • Jennie (she/her)
    ... don't even get me started on supermarket shelves being designed around the 5'8" average male body when I am 5' and quarter of an inch... Most humans of w...
  • Jacci stoyle
    I thought this was an excellent article, brilliantly written and extremely interesting. I also read Invisible Women and was shocked at just how much of women's ...
  • Christopher Stafford
    I think it is wrong to assume that defenders of free-speech are secretly concerned with the promotion of one agenda. This is the party of Mill- that man who mad...
  • Jenny Hazell
    I wonder if the author could give some examples of the sort of speech he thinks needs to be shut down. People who say " how revolting they find LGBT+ people (pa...