Mark Pack

Six senior Labour figures should have known about David Abrahams in 2003

By | Wed 28th November 2007 - 1:03 pm

In May 2002 Charles Clarke (then chair of the Labour Party) announced the creation of a new six person committee to vet all Labour Party donations of more than £5,000 (source: BBC).

The members were:

  • Charles Clarke
  • Lord Evans of Temple Guiting, chairman of Faber and Faber 
  • Margaret Prosser, deputy leader of the Transport and General Workers’ Union 
  • Lord Levy, the Labour party’s former chief fundraiser
  • David Triesman, Labour’s general secretary (during whose tenure several David Abrahams donations were received) 
  • Baroness Jay of Paddington, former Labour leader of the House of Lords (who has featured in the David Abrahams story already)
    (Source: The Independent)

The first of the David Abrahams-related donations was made from Janet Dunn, and received by the Labour Party on 31 January 2003, i.e. a few months after this committee was created. It was for £25,000, which is more than the £5,000 threshold for referral to this committee.

So what happened when that donation came in?

Labour’s story so far this week seems to be that the committee never met. But Levy (and almost certainly Clarke and Triesman) would have known that Labour was receiving donations from all sorts of sources for more than £5,000. And several would have known about Labour’s stated policy of having donations of more than £5,000 vetted by the committee. For example, David Triesman appeared on Radio 4’s Today program talking about the new committee.

So what did happen?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Daniel Walker
    @David Raw I am afraid I don't know that; however I am always wary of arguments that say we should have the cheapest possible democracy. (Which isn't to say ...
  • Daniel Walker
    @Kira I was at the debate where that policy was decided. There were two other options: one was the regions of England having the same powers as Scotland and ...
  • David Raw
    @ Daniel Walker Has the party costed the amount for changing to the arrangement you describe, Daniel, and what amount does it come to ? For my part I wo...
  • David Raw
    Mick Taylor is correct, and I well remember the late Dr Michael Winstanley (the then Liberal MP for Cheadle) giving the Minister, David Ennals, a torrid time in...
  • Kira Collins
    @Daniel Walker Thank you for that information. I did not know that our position was that laws for the whole of England should be made by an indirectly elected ...