Cameron and Osborne disagree over economic policy

David Cameron in the News of the World today had a pop at Brown/Darling and their international travel to discuss economic matters:

People need help . . . and they need it fast. They want to know politicians are on their side—not the other side of the world.

But on the very same day that David Cameron was attacking people making international journeys to discuss economic issues with other countries, George Osborne on the Financial Times website was calling for plenty of just that, with his list of demands for better international action:

I am sure all will agree that greater international co-operation is needed…
international regulation must be improved…
the position of the IMF [International Monetary Fund] must be strengthened…
we need proper regulation of areas of the global financial system that have gone, in effect, unregulated.

Oops.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @Tristan Ward - "So, assuming there are no tax loopholes, what is the point of earning another £1 if the government take away 83p of it?" Depends on ...
  • David Warren
    It's a great pity that we only have one candidate who is eligible for this key role!...
  • John Kelly
    I guess we knew it but nonetheless it is disappointing that year after year the autumn Conference these days is always on the south coast - reinforcing the sout...
  • Tristan Ward
    @PM "The big divide is between {property owners} and renters. If you are serious about tacking inequality we’d need to factor in the economic benefits ...
  • Tristan Ward
    @Roland "whilst the salary was taxed at 98% there were other ways (before 1979) of taking the monies tax free". I'm not really sure what your point is. ...