Dept of Transport admits: Hoon withholding information about Heathrow from MPs

I recently sent Geoff Hoon an email concerning his statement to the House of Commons on the third Heathrow runway. Whilst I was asking him a rather obscure and pedantic point relating to the language he used, the reply I got is rather revealing.

To that end [deciding about the third runway], the Secretary of State reached his decision on the basis of a transparent and objective analysis of the evidence available as a result of the consultation that has taken place. He alone had the necessary knowledge of all the facts and issues that required consideration.

It would not have been appropriate for Parliament to participate in making the decision. Parliament would not have had access to all of the facts, assumptions and analyses that underpinned his decision.” [emphasis added]

So, Mr Hoon, just what information did you withhold from the UK’s sovereign decision-making body, which is meant to scrutinise your decisions and hold you accountable on behalf of the public?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • David Heigham 11th Mar '09 - 1:03pm

    A Freedom of Information request?
    ‘Please list all the facts, assumptions and analyses that Parliament would not have had access to?’

  • Was just about to say what David H says above. Definitely worth a go.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Barker 26th Mar - 11:01am
    I hope this is true but there are plenty of indications the other way too, The ERG seems to be shifting towards backing Mays Deal...
  • User AvatarDenis Loretto 26th Mar - 10:37am
    @Peter Martin Sorry, it might be possible to allege that the people manning street stalls and the like are members of some privileged elite but...
  • User AvatarRoland 26th Mar - 10:34am
    @Bill - Yes, I do hope the Commons can reach a verdict, which includes the possibility of May's deal (although I would prefer something else)....
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 26th Mar - 10:28am
    Layla makes a cogent argument when she says "It is a fallacy to think that there is still an ongoing peace process" and that "the...
  • User AvatarRoland 26th Mar - 10:14am
    Yet another article that by its omission says that LibDem policy is to promote continued dependency on imported workers rather than investing in those already...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 26th Mar - 9:58am
    Top psephologist John Curtice has been saying that people are likely to vote the same way in another referendum as they did in 2016. He...