Digital Economy Bill debate: what’s set to happen tomorrow?

The story so far:

  • Emergency motion on the Digital Economy Bill submitted (see full text on Bridget Fox’s blog)
  • Federal Conference Committee treat it fairly generously – as emergency motions do not normally get into the territory of drawing up significant new party policy (because, by their nature, the wording is only published at the last moment and so people have little time to debate over it, draw up alternatives etc.).
  • There are two emergency motions but only a slot to debate one of them – so conference voted this morning on which to debate tomorrow. Digital Economy Bill motion wins that vote over a motion on health.
  • Danny Alexander MP (Vice Chair, Federal Policy Committee) makes significant commitments, saying the party will try to further change the Digital Economy Bill in the Commons and to draw up new policies after the election.

So the one chapter in this story left to play out at the party’s spring conference is the debate tomorrow morning on the emergency motion.

There has been a sequence of MPs so far, some privately and some more publicly agreeing with the proposition, “We have to do more; the current proposals from Lib Dem peers on the Digital Economy Bill are not enough”. Several have expressed concern at the number of people who have contacted them on the issue already.

When in the past there have been motions which goes against the party line, the wishes of the leader or are claimed to have scope to embarrass the party various different pieces of machinery have been kicked in to action in order to try to secure the ‘right’ outcome. On this issue, the machinery is overall notably inactive and, in particular, there are no strong moves to encourage MPs to turn up and oppose the motion.

All of which means we should have a good debate tomorrow on the merits of the issue itself and – if the motion is passed – not only address the short-term Digital Economy Bill but also start to address some of the wider issues about how the party makes policy in this area.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Conference and Party policy and internal matters.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Andrew Suffield 13th Mar '10 - 9:12pm

    Getting a working group set up to cover this area is possibly the single most important outcome here. Be nice to see that happen (although I suppose it will depend to some extent on who fills it)

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    Peter Watson: Lib Dems are fighting Chesham & Amersham to win, whatever the Greens decide to do. We're not likely to put much effort into Batley & Spen,...
  • Paul Barker
    In case anyone else is sick of the Gloom & Doom on this thread can I point to the latest Poll putting us on 11%. Of course that does not mean that we are...
  • Katharine Pindar
    It's good to hear of demands in Parliament for protests to be made against the discriminatory actions of the Israeli government against the Palestinians in East...
  • Mike Read
    The specific criticism of Clegg in the article was that he was involved in suspending Trumps Facebook account earlier this year....
  • Denis Mollison
    @Stephen - there are `toxic' members and attitutdes in all the parties, including our own. The SNP need to be treated as potential allies on electoral reform: ...