Ed Davey’s performance at PMQs today was described by New Statesman journalist Rachel Cunliffe as “devastating” to Keir Starmer. She compared and contrasted Kemi Badenoch’s mis-steps with Ed making Starmer “awkward” when faced with questions about the NI rise for GP practices.
At the very start of PMQs, Jardine set up the topic of the NI rise with a straightforward question on support for GP practices. Ed Davey then picked up the theme once Badenoch was finished, asking for a further commitment that GPs, pharmacies and other healthcare providers would be protected from the tax rise. His tone was mild, his question factual rather than aggressive. But it made Starmer more awkward than he had been at any point facing Badenoch. After the Prime Minister had answered, Davey said quietly: “I think patients and GPs listening to that will want more reassurance”. It was devastating.
Christine Jardine asked the very first question at PMQs today, on that NI rise, having spent last week meeting worried GP practices in her Edinburgh West constituency.
Changes to employers' National Insurance threaten the ability of GPs to deliver patient care. I asked the Prime Minister to explain to GPs, and others in my constituency, how they are meant to cope without extra support. pic.twitter.com/2Q9Ux3O9zF
— Christine Jardine 🔶 (@cajardineMP) November 13, 2024
In the two weeks since the Budget, several GP practices in my constituency of Edinburgh West, including my own, have contacted me with their genuine fears that the impact of the changes to national insurance employer contributions will threaten their ability to continue to offer the public the same standard of health service that they currently receive. And they are far from the only ones struggling, particularly in the health and social care sectors. Can the Prime Minister explain to me—perhaps he and his Chancellor would like to come to my constituency and explain to GPs, charities and others—how they are meant to cope without extra support from the Government?
The Prime Minister
Because of the tough decisions that we took, we have put forward a Budget with an extra £25.6 billion for the NHS and for social care. That includes an increase to carers’ allowance and £600 million to deal with the pressures of adult social care. We will ensure that GP practices have the resources that they need, and the funding arrangements between the NHS and contractors will be set out in the usual way.
Ed followed up with his first question
“Will the government at least exempt GPs, community pharmacists and other health and care providers from this tax rise?”@EdwardJDavey pushed the government to rethink the NI hikes on GP surgeries which could see millions struggling even more to secure an appointment. pic.twitter.com/C78JugqAfB
— Liberal Democrats (@LibDems) November 13, 2024
His second was on the importance of working with European leaders to support Ukraine given the impending Trump administration:
Today, I questioned the Prime Minister on his plan if Donald Trump abandons our brave Ukrainian allies.
If the US won't support Ukraine in its fight against Putin's war machine, the UK and Europe must – and we should use frozen Russian assets to do it. pic.twitter.com/GrmA6rehn1
— Ed Davey (@EdwardJDavey) November 13, 2024
When it comes to fixing the crisis in the NHS that he has inherited, the Prime Minister has rightly recognised the need to improve access to GPs, but as is the case for my hon. Friend the Member for Edinburgh West (Christine Jardine), GPs in my constituency are writing to tell me how worried they are about the national insurance hike’s impact on patient care. I listened very carefully to what the Prime Minister said to my hon. Friend, but I hope he will think again. Will he at least exempt GPs, community pharmacists and other health and care providers from that tax rise?
The Prime Minister
I hear the point that the right hon. Gentleman makes, and I understand the concern. We have made a huge investment in our NHS—the biggest ever investment in our NHS for many, many years—and certainly almost all the people working in the NHS are very pleased to see that investment in them and in their service. On the question of GPs, we will ensure that they have the resources they need, and the funding arrangements will be set out in the usual way later this year.Ed Davey
I have to say, I think patients, GPs and others listening to that answer will want more reassurance, and will want it much more quickly.Turning to the war in Ukraine, a senior adviser to President-elect Trump, Donald Trump junior, has shared a post on Instagram declaring that soon, within the next few weeks, President Zelensky will “lose his allowance”. If the Trump Administration do withdraw support from our brave Ukrainian allies, will the UK and Europe step up to fill the gap? Will the Prime Minister seize frozen Russian assets—not just the interest, but the assets underlying it—so that we can fund a huge boost to the Ukrainian forces in their fight against Putin’s war machine?
The Prime Minister
As the right hon. Gentleman knows, we have been resolute and strong in our support for Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression. As he also knows, in recent weeks, I have been speaking with other leaders about how we put Ukraine in the best and strongest possible position at this time. I will continue those discussions.
Alex Brewer was the third Lib Dem to take on Keir Starmer seeking a commitment on chalk stream rivers:
Today, I questioned the Prime Minister on the protection of important chalk stream rivers.
While I am pleased that there will be tougher powers more generally, I would like to see a special protection for these unique ecosystems.#chalkstream #sewage #PMQs #environment pic.twitter.com/VofMeGb2ez
— Alex Brewer MP 🔶 (@alexbrewer) November 13, 2024
Chalk stream rivers are rare and have a unique ecology. Most of them are in the UK, and two are in my constituency of North East Hampshire. Last year, chalk stream rivers were hit with 14,000 hours of sewage discharges, but the previous Government did nothing, despite calls for action from my hon. Friend the Member for Chesham and Amersham (Sarah Green). Will the Prime Minister introduce a special protection for our chalk stream rivers?
The Prime Minister
I thank the hon. Member for raising this issue. We are committed to the protection and restoration of unique chalk streams. She is right that the destruction of our waterways should never have been allowed, and we have announced immediate action to end this disgraceful behaviour: new powers and tougher penalties, including fines; banning bonuses; and bringing criminal charges against those who persistently break the law. We have also launched a water commission.
The Labour whips had been busy getting their MPs to ask really soft questions. I don’t like it when ours do it either. This was a particularly fine example of the genre of planted question from Lloyd Hatton:
Members have raised their concerns about a range of damaging policies pursued by the Leader of the Opposition. This includes voting against critical investment for our NHS, stating that maternity pay is excessive and the minimum wage a burden, and even backing harmful fracking when last in government. Is the Prime Minister aware of any attempt by the Leader of the Opposition to justify these dangerous positions, which would cause untold damage to communities such as mine in South Dorset?
* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings
2 Comments
I am made about our party’s campaign to exempt doctors’ practices from the rise in NI contributions. At the founding of the NHS the doctors demanded to be treated as private businesses and Nye Bevan had to “stuff their mouths with gold” to persuaded them to sign up to the national service free at the point of use. Now they’re doing “Johnson” (wanting to have their cake and eat it.) This is hugely relevant as many practices are now owned by profit maximising hedge funds and such like. The party should think rather more carefully and not jump on every passing populist bandwagon.
Not made, or mad, but uneasy. Sorry