EXCLUSIVE: 84% of Lib Dem members back Lib-Con Coalition – but 46% say it will be bad for party’s electoral fortunes

Lib Dem Voice has polled our members-only forum to discover what Lib Dem members think of the Coalition Government’s budget, and what you make of the Lib Dems’ and Government’s performance to date. Almost 600 party members have responded, and we’re currently publishing the full results of our survey.

First, let’s take the temperature of the party membership regarding their view of the Lib-Con Coalition agreement, now some two months old:

Do you support or oppose the Lib Dems being in the Coalition Government with the Conservatives?

  • 84% – Support
  • 11% – Oppose
  • 5% – Don’t know / No opinion

Interestingly, this month’s results are exactly the same as July’s – and as I wrote then: “The figure of 84% suggest support for the coalition is holding up pretty well among members”. In a previous Voice survey at the end of May, 86% of party members declared themselves “happy” with the coalition agreement. It is, mind you, down a notch on the 91% who told us they would back the coalition in the middle of May.

Support for the coalition is one thing – but what do Lib Dem members think of the performance of the coalition government:

Do you approve or disapprove of the Coalition Government’s record to date?

  • 67% – Approve
  • 22% – Disapprove
  • 11% – Don’t know / No opinion

Our sample of party members shows the Coalition Government with a net approval rating of +45%. In itself not too bad, but it should be noted that last month the split was 74% / 17%, a net approval rating of +57% – so the Government’s approval ratings among Lib Dem members have slipped 12% in the past month.

It’s clear from the comments from some members that, while the Coalition agreement still has high support, there is a greater sense nopw of its inevitability, that the party didn’t have any other choice, rather than a huge groundswell of enthusiasm for the actions of the Coalition in government.

Here are a handful of your comments:

  • I think being in coalition government was the least worst option open. I do not support the Government, but do support the party within Government.
  • Better that the Conservatives are restrained by LD centrist policies than allowng the Conservative right to hold sway.
  • I originally held judgement on the coalition, but I feel now that we are being manipulated by the Conservatives. It has been very damaging to the party.
  • I have been impressed by the flexibility of the Tories, and the way they have ignored their right wing.
  • Yeah but no but yeah but no…. whilst I think Cameron won the right to be PM, and I’m delighted they didn’t get a majority with the far-right cracking the whip, and I think working together is both responsible and necessary, I remain unconvinced from a campaigning perspective that this won’t annhilate us.
  • Cut tax credits, benefits, drug test job seekers, increase prison times, cock-up the University system even further and demand an almost completely insignificant change to the voting system. Triumph!
  • I’m not entirely happy with the glee that cuts have been presented with but I’m delighted about the taxation changes for low earners
  • Failure to form a coalition in May would have been self-indulgent: Britain needed stable government and we needed to seize the chance to implement SOME of our policies. To form a coalition with Labour would have been to prop up a failed government that we had opposed for 13 years. It would also have destroyed our credibility with the electorate.
  • The popular perceptiption is that we have favoured those who could afford to shoulder more of the burden and we’ve let the Banks off the hook
  • I approve so far, but I feel Clegg and the parliamentary party are reaching a crucial point in the history of the coalition. Party members reconciled themselves to the coalition because of the strength of the coalition document. To maintain that support Clegg and co need to advocate much more forcefully in favour of the Lib Dem position within government and communicate that to the public.
  • Jury is out on many aspects of policy, but so far so good.
  • Then to the issue which has caused all Lib Dems some jitters over the past 100+ days – however mature / sensible / inevitable the coalition agreement is, will we lose MPs because of it?

    Do you think the Coalition Government will be good or bad for the Lib Dems’ electoral prospects at the next general election?

    • 17% – Good
    • 46% – Bad
    • 20% – Neither good nor bad
    • 18% – Don’t know / No opinion

    So approaching half (46%) our sample of party members reckon the Lib Dems will take a hit for signing up to the coalition. Just 17% reckon we wll benefit while a further 20% think the effect will be neutral. Understandably, almost one-fifth of Lib Dem members in our sample have no idea what might (or might not) happen in the course of this Parliament, and how it will affect, positively or not, the Lib Dems.

    Compared with last month – where the split was 43% bad / 23% good / 17% no difference – there is a small but clear shift towards Lib Dem members expecting the party to suffer at the next general election for our particpation in the Coalition. Yet at the same time, support for the principle of the Coalition is just as high as ever… whatever the cynics say, it’s clear party members are pursuing Coalition in the purist belief that ‘we must do the right thing’ rather than a self-interested belief that the party is onto an electoral winner.

    And finally for today:

    How long do you expect the coalition government will last?

    • 1% – Less than a year
    • 8% – A year to two years
    • 15% – Two to three years
    • 71% – Four years or more
    • 5% – Don’t know / No opinion

    71% of party members think the Coalition will last the full parliamentary term, compared with a combined total of 24% who think it will fall before then. This is a contrast with the last time we asked this question, at the end of May, when 63% of party members thought the Coalition would last, compared with 38% who anticipated an early implosion. If nothing else, this points to a significant shift in belief that the Coalition – still a remarkable innovation in peacetime British politics – is stable, and here to stay for some time to come.

    You can catch up with the results of all our LDV members surveys by clicking here.

    Read more by .
    This entry was posted in LDV Members poll.
    Advert

    8 Comments

    • A regional breakdown would be nicer. I guess more members in the north would not like it and think the coalition would damage our electoral prospects.

    • Foregone Conclusion 31st Aug '10 - 3:00pm

      Dave – it might not be as simple as that. Don’t forget those of us in northern constituencies where the Tories are the main enemy! But I agree that a regional breakdown in future surveys might be an interesting addition.

    • mike cobley 31st Aug '10 - 7:01pm

      The deficit axe is yet to swing. We can expect these figures to change radically come the end of the year.

    • 84% in favour – So that’s pretty divided then, huh? That’s one in the eye for the “splittist” theoreticians. I wonder if Mike (the Labour one) is going to poke his head in here. Perhaps not.

    • It could be bad for the Lib Dems if their part in the coalition government is viewed as merely making up the numbers so that the Conservatives could get into government.

      This view would not be helped by the relatively uninfluential or unimportant positions which have been given, and given to only a few Lib Dem MP’s.

      If there is a referendum in 2011 on alternative voting, if the alternative voting system proposed by the Lib Dems is adopted by the UK, and if it works…then that will really boost popularity for the Lib Dems.

      That’s a big gamble though, and the tabloids (Daily Mail, Mirror, Sun) will be thoroughly against replacing the first past the post system; they will particularly focus on the failures of any voting system which preceded the first past the post voting system.

      Big business will also be heavily against it, as they want the Conservatives in government.

      So the Lib Dems are currently (in the long term) probably safest thinking about how to change the view that they are merely making up the numbers.

      The positions given to the Lib Dems are not really that influential, so they’ll have to work with what they’ve got.

      They’ve got Vince Cable working under Ken Clarke.

      They’ve got Nick Clegg working under David Cameron.

      They’ve got Danny Alexander working under George Osborne.

      They’ve got Chris Huhne working under Caroline Spelman.

      Assuming that the Tories are all like Jim Hacker of Yes Minister, and assuming that they are the usual stereotypical short sighted MP’s looking to fill the same well worn pockets and spout the same propaganda, paying the same recognised experts and ignoring their advice and going their own way regardlesss…

      …then this presents a wonderful opportunity for the Lib Dems.

      The Lib Dems are working for the Conservatives at the moment, and may be in a position to restrain some of their more extreme or excessive ideas; whilst also fulfilling the postion of Sir Humphrey Appleby.

      That’s right, the Lib Dems could maintain friendly relations with civil servants and utilise relations with junior ministers. They can really understand the system from the inside out and use it to advise their Jim Hackers and make things happen.

      This is a strength which the Lib Dems should focus on; they are the underdog and the underdog is friendly with the very people who make the country tick.

      Used correctly, this is a strong and influential position to be in.

      My message to the Lib Dems is, use this position.

    • Darren Reynolds 2nd Sep '10 - 12:45am

      Would have liked an option for “I can’t stand the Tories and don’t think we should be in government with them, but I’ll go along with it for the sake of party unity”.

    • David Allen 5th Sep '10 - 9:10pm

      “Would have liked an option for “I can’t stand the Tories and don’t think we should be in government with them, but I’ll go along with it for the sake of party unity”.”

      But for how much longer I wonder? As the cuts bite, and the privatisation policies start to take effect, the only way for the coalition’s ratings to go will be down.

    Post a Comment

    Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

    If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

    To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

    Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

    *
    *
    Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

    Advert



    Recent Comments

    • John Roffey
      Paul - I am not a member of the Party - so I am not worried about the Party's future. However, it is important that there is a strong third UK/GB party to keep ...
    • Peter Martin
      @ Peter Watson @ Daniel Walker, Yep it only takes a few cases of abuse of the system, or even what might just about be presented as marginally doubtful cases...
    • Peter Watson
      @Daniel Walker "it could easily be the difference between malnutrition and a decent amount food, so I that would be life-changing for some" I was thinking of "...
    • Helen Dudden
      Lord Snooty was from a different era. I don't think that exists as such anymore. Applying that principal to hungry children, or there families is from a time ...
    • Peter Watson
      @Daniel Walker "I recall the Metro had a front page on a family that they alleged was living the high life on about £28k in benefits ..." There were a lot of ...