Farron, Huppert & Sanders say: Time to take a tough stand on biofuels

Biofuel BusIt’s World Food Day and Tim Farron, Julian Huppert and Adrian Sanders have joined Zac Goldsmith, Caroline Lucas and other MPs in a joint letter to the Guardian to condemn EU policy on biofuels.

Taking land out of food production – which is increasingly happening in Africa – pushes up global food prices, while bringing new land into production leads to drained wetlands, ploughed-up grasslands and razed forests.

The writers are concerned that first generation biofuels, crops like wheat and oilseed rape, are being used for transport fuel. These crops are an essential food for a rapidly expanding global population. The letter gives a blunt message to the European Union, which is currently debating the cap on biofuel use in transport fuel.

The Lithuanian presidency of the EU is not pushing for a tight enough cap on damaging biofuels, nor pushing for measures to capture their full climate impacts, and we urge the UK government to show leadership in the negotiations and encourage other member states to support a 5% cap that will stop further increases in the use of food for fuel.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Eddie Sammon 16th Oct '13 - 11:46am

    The severity of the problems of biofuels was created by the European Union’s biofuel directive back in 2003. If you seek to implement another directive then you’ll just have more unintended consequences. I think the best solution is to scrap all hard targets and limits. Just because something uses up land or takes down some trees doesn’t make it inherently bad.

  • Richard Dean 16th Oct '13 - 11:49am

    Is this a joke? The first quote seems to suggest that any change at all to land use is bad. Perhaps it could have been worded a little better? But the real joke is surely that people used to be all in favour of biofuels, which tends to suggest we shouldn’t believe all these dire warnings anyway – give it a couple of years and biofuels will be in favour again!

  • Eddie Sammon 16th Oct '13 - 12:11pm

    The unintended consequences of introducing this 5% cap, and therefore forcing the market for second generation biofuels open, will mainly be more expensive fuel. I don’t mind people recommending this, but I want to see this consequence mentioned everywhere where the legislation is proposed.

  • Eddie Sammon 16th Oct '13 - 12:51pm

    Just read the letter to the Guardian and it doesn’t mention any of the negatives of this legislation, the 5% cap or second generation biofuels. This makes me sad – a politician’s job should be to sell themselves and their party, whilst providing a law-making service to the public. It is not acceptable to leave out the negatives of laws, just like it is not acceptable to leave out the negatives of a £100,000 interest-rate swap or a PPI contract, just because you think it is for the best.

  • David Evans 16th Oct '13 - 2:46pm

    Eddie, It’s a letter to raise an issue, not an academic thesis on the impact of proposed legislation in its entirety. That will hopefully come later.

  • Eddie Sammon 16th Oct '13 - 4:16pm

    David, I don’t think it is good enough to just include the negatives in a report that hardly anyone will read and I am only asking from them what they expect and in fact force from us in financial services and other industries via regulation.

    I also researched biofuels for 18 months back in 2006-8 and all these problems were known then. I don’t like the way they are talking about taking a “tough stand on biofuels”, when in fact the tough stand that needs to be taken is against ill-thought-out legislation left in place for years.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Jayne mansfield
    @ Mark, A moderators job must be a very difficult one. I think the subject matter that caused such problems , does so because whether one is straight,,gay ...
  • Mark ValladaresMark Valladares
    @ Nigel, Then you’re not really being censored, are you? You are perfectly at liberty to publish and be damned. You decide the policy and accept or reject ...
  • Jeremy Hargreaves
    Thanks for the comments and interest above. Helen I certainly hope you will apply. And others! Links in the original piece, as I'm sure you saw. @Tad Jones ...
  • Paul Barker
    We all owe the LDV Team a vote of thanks for their work & patience....
  • Nigel Scott
    It is some time since I considered LibDem hosted websites and Facebook pages to be tolerant of free speech. I agree with John Stuart Mill: "The peculiar evil of...