Farron leads demand for better public toilets

Now, here’s a challenge – write an entire article about public lavatories without recourse to toilet humour. Here goes, courtesy of the BBC write-up

Local authorities should have a “statutory duty” to provide public toilets, the government has been urged. Some 26 MPs have signed a House of Commons motion arguing that the closure of public lavatories in recent years has been damaging. … The MPs, led by the Lib Dem environment spokesman Tim Farron, are backing a campaign by the British Toilets Association (BTA) for better facilities.

Mr Farron said the fact councils were not compelled to provide toilets meant many areas – particularly in the countryside – faced a chronic lack of amenities. “It’s an issue for everybody – we all need to use the loo,” he said. “But in rural areas, where there are often large elderly populations and there aren’t any public toilets from one mile to the next, it’s particularly acute.”

Here’s the text of Tim’s EDM 176 (which seems to date from November 2006, albeit it’s on;y just being reported):

That this House believes that the provision of public lavatories is a vital public service and notes with regret the closure of public lavatories over recent years, including a quarter of those in South Lakeland; recognises that these closures have a particular impact on older and disabled people and those with young families; also notes the recent National Consumer Council survey of 2,000 adults, which branded the UK’s public lavatories a ‘national disgrace’; and calls upon the Government to make the provision of public lavatories a statutory duty for local authorities and to provide the necessary resources to enable them to do so.

Okay, phew, got to the end of the article with not even a single allusion to ‘going down the pan’, ‘papering over the cracks’, or ‘at our conveniece’. Truly I have matured from boy to man.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Local government, News and Parliament.
Advert

6 Comments

  • And Farron gets paid £ 64,000 a year to come up with this crap.

  • Ian Stewart 18th Jul '09 - 8:19am

    in response to john zims:
    this is a significant issue for many of Tim’s constituents, and it is right and proper that he represents their views. Isn’t that part of the job of an MP?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 23rd Sep - 7:38pm
    David Allen: It is not going to appeal to such people when it is clearly a dog-whistle for Brexit supporters. And what you forget is...
  • User Avatarfrankie 23rd Sep - 7:28pm
    Britain's none functioning Oppersition voted to remain wedded to the fence. To a rendition of O Jeremy Corbyn Mr and Mrs Corbyn-Fence left the conference...
  • User AvatarPeter 23rd Sep - 7:26pm
    The manner in which Juncker's replacement and other Commissioners have been elected tells you everything you need to know about the shocking democratic deficit within...
  • User AvatarMark Platt 23rd Sep - 7:25pm
    Thanks to both Maureen and Andy for your responses. My article specifically references the continental model, where investment organisations do take long term views, over...
  • User AvatarDavid Allen 23rd Sep - 7:21pm
    "The people who buy the arguments against our Revoke policy ... aren’t going to vote for us anyway. Why pander to them?" The argument is...
  • User AvatarPeter 23rd Sep - 7:08pm
    The above post is mildly entertaining but not very accurate. Giving a clear choice…, Know what they’re getting…, Not going to impose a PM…, Not...
Thu 10th Oct 2019