Fate of John Dixon and Aled Roberts hangs in the balance

More details have come of how Welsh Assembly (Possibly) Members John Dixon and Aled Roberts have ended up in the predicament of having their election questioned, but the eventual outcome is still unclear.

Aled Robert’s stood for election despite holding a disqualifying post – with the Valuation Tribunal for Wales. He has since resigned from that position, but the reason he was not aware that it was a disqualifying post is that it was missing from much of the legal guidance available to election candidates and their agents. For example, the Electoral Commission’s official guidance made reference to the wrong (older) list of disqualifying posts, which excludes the Valuation Tribunal. Similarly the National Assembly of Wales’s website and the training materials used by the Electoral Commission at a Welsh Liberal Democrats even earlier in the year both made the same mistake.

So he seems to have a very good case for saying that he was telling the truth when he signed his consent to nomination paper stating that “to the best of my knowledge and belief I am not disqualified”. That should provide an extremely strong defence in response to the police inquiry demanded by UKIP. Less clear is whether or not the Welsh Assembly can vote to let him take his seat anyway. The short version of it is that there are conflicting distinguished legal opinions on that matter.

John Dixon’s case is a little more complicated. He also had a post with the Care Council for Wales that was also on the disqualified list and, unlike in Aled Roberts’s case, there was no misinformation over it. However, he has an email from the Care Council for Wales saying that his membership of the body had been terminated.The email is vulnerable on two fronts – whether that was sufficient to legally end his membership of the body and, even if so, whether that happened soon enough. Again, there are conflicting legal opinions on whether or not the Welsh Assembly can vote to regulate matters in his case using its powers under section 17(3) of the Government of Wales Act 2006.

There are some parallels with the case of Conservative MP Bob Neill, who was elected in the Bromley & Chislehurst by-election despite holding a disqualifying post until the day after the election. In that case the Liberal Democrats argued he was disqualified, but mindful of the outcome of the Winchester by-election, did not pursue an election petition after he was declared elected. That case therefore does not provide legal guidance for the Welsh case, especially as the legal details around disqualification are different between the Westminster Parliament and Welsh Assembly.

If one or both are unable to take up their seats, they would be replaced by the next Liberal Democrat candidate on the party’s lists as both were elected via the regional list part of the Welsh Assembly.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.


  • David Boothroyd 23rd May '11 - 11:39am

    The Parliamentary situation with disqualified candidates was settled after a series of cases came to light in 1955 – it was discovered that several MPs held public appointments which were unpaid but there was provision (never used) for repayment of expenses, and no-one had realised that this made them ‘offices of profit under the crown’. The upshot of it all was that the House of Commons Disqualification Act 1957 was passed which allowed (s. 6) for the House to resolve to disregard a disqualification where the MP had been unaware and had since resigned the office in question.

    In Dr Winstanley’s case, such a resolution was passed on 3 April 1974. He was a GP in a group practice which held the appointment of medical officer to the Royal Ordnance Factory at Patricroft, which made him technically a civil servant.

  • Tony Dawson 23rd May '11 - 5:44pm

    “In that case the Liberal Democrats argued he was disqualified, but mindful of the outcome of the Winchester by-election, did not pursue an election petition after he was declared elected. ”

    It is totally ridiculous that these issues are ONLY resoluble through an expensive adversarial system. Surely a body like the Electoral Commission ought to be able to arraign a ‘wrong’ MP or councillor having performed an inquisitorial role on information supplied to it in good faith suggesting that a candidate was disqualified. “The Electoral Commission do something useful?” Heaven forbid!

  • Hilary mcguill 24th May '11 - 7:54am

    We ,the rank and file ,still have to carry on and would appreciate someone taking the reigns and sorting out this dilemma.It is not in Labours interest to hurry things along ,as it stands at present without the two A.M.,s being able to fulfil their roles Labour have a majority so please please will someone put pressure on Welsh Government to make the decision.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 4th Jun - 9:23am
    I strongly agree with Tom Purvis. The election review warned that we talk about things that interest us, "at the expense of constantly thinking about...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 4th Jun - 9:01am
    Matthew Huntbach / James Fowler The idea of moving into the gap left by the Tories (which isn't imho a straight right/left issue) is problematised...
  • User AvatarMatt (Bristol) 4th Jun - 8:51am
    As much as I want eye-catching and coherent policies from a leader, I mainly want the nous to shape a party with a coherent ideology...
  • User AvatarJames Fowler 4th Jun - 8:42am
    @ Matthew - interesting points, thank you.
  • User AvatarFrank West 4th Jun - 8:01am
    If you are happy to pay UK income tax and capital gains on your overseas money then you should have the right to vote, if...
  • User AvatarChristopher Curtis 4th Jun - 8:00am
    I agree with these comments too. It’s vital that we choose a leader to do the job of leading the party, and performance in detailed,...