First election debate: winners and losers

Now the dust is starting to settle after the first debate, who are the winners and losers – aside from the party leaders?

Winner – liberalism
Loser – hostility to foreigners

Praising some aspects of immigration, talking about no like-for-like replacement of Trident, pledging to scrap tuition fees, promising to cut taxes for most by raising taxes for the very rich – Nick Clegg won the debate not by abandoning policies for some  mushy middle ground, but by sticking to core liberal beliefs. Those beliefs were carefully wrapped in language and arguments designed to be appeal to a wide audience – but here was a high profile demonstration that done properly, liberal arguments can be made and won. (I suspect a significant degree of the credit for this should go to John Sharkey, one of Nick’s most trusted advisers, who has been a consistent advocate of using arguments and styles that reach out to wider audiences.)

On the immigration question it was striking that Brown was very negative about immigration, Clegg had something positive to say – and Cameron only had something positive to say after he’d seen Clegg take the positive route. Clegg and Cameron finished in a statistical tie (with Cameron notionally just ahead) on their immigration comments – a clear sign that a well-argued liberal case can win public support.

Winner – TV
Loser – internet

The TV audience peaked at just under 10m, far more than any online audience for a UK political event. TV kept on broadcasting whilst Facebook and Tweetminster buckled under the load.

Winner – Times and Telegraph
Loser – Mirror

All three had to face a poll result that didn’t suit their editorial line. The Times and Daily Telegraph reported the result fairly and prominently. The Mirror’s front page was about how great Brown is.

Winner – Iain Dale
Loser – Tim Montgomerie

Iain praised Clegg’s performance and rated him the winner whilst Tim tweeted wondering if Clegg had been given an unfair amount of air
time.

Winner – proper polling companies
Loser – voodoo polls

The voodoo polls (i.e. those where anyone can vote and it’s easy to vote more than once) were quickly eclipsed by instant polls from reputable companies.

Winner – unofficial Liberal Democrat Facebook group
Loser – official Conservative Facebook page

Helped by the debate, the already strongly growing Facebook group surged onwards and now has comfortably more members than the Conservative Page has fans.

Winner – #iagreewithnick
Loser – Brown’s soundbites

Normally the defining moments of a political debate come from spot on soundbites or awful clangers. This time it was something complete different; just four simple words that most of the time would be unexceptional: “I agree with Nick”. But said repeatedly, they became the notable catchphrase of the event and have spawned a wave of online enthusiasm in messages, tweets and sales of unofficial branded merchandise.

This has also drowned up what were actually a couple of fairly good soundbites from Gordon Brown. Uttered at PMQs the lines about airbrushing and Answer Time would have made for good evening news clips.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in General Election and Op-eds.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Dr Watson Gould 20th Apr '10 - 2:07pm

    I would like to hear Lib Dems making more effort to find Liberal answers to those awkward questions, so that they do not get labled ‘the same as the others’. Examples: 1) when asked would they support Labs or Cons in a ‘hung’ Parliament, why not take the interviewer to task more over the word ‘hung’? If Parliament is ‘hung’ then the voting public is ‘hung’ and therefore correctly representative of diversity. And isn’t representation supposed to be what Parliament is all about? Anyone wanting to argue against that can be dismissed as authoritative at best, a dictator at worst. 2) when asked about seats v votes in relation to election outcomes, why not argue that such points are for those parties that believe in FPTP to answer, not for those who believe in STV? I could go on…I probably shall…

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRuth Bright 23rd Jan - 10:49am
    Graham perhaps women didn't want to stand in the patch I mentioned because of the blokeish atmosphere in the local party. One of the old...
  • User AvatarJeff 23rd Jan - 10:31am
    Anne Chitnis 21st Jan '20 - 8:03pm: And why did nobody understand that the huge numbers who voted LibDem in the European elections were bound...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 23rd Jan - 10:25am
    Thanks, Peter. That's an interesting comment. I agree that sometimes we do tend to dwell rather a lot on diversity issues, and we should perhaps...
  • User AvatarJo Wan 23rd Jan - 10:21am
    "...sudden influx of both former Conservative remainers, and Labour social democrats is going to swamp the Liberal core of the party and kill it." And...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 23rd Jan - 9:46am
    Steve Nunn East Dunbartonshire: 2010 She won 2015 She stood but didn't win 2017 She won 2019 She stood but didn't win - So no...
  • User AvatarFrank West 23rd Jan - 9:19am
    David Raw, Gordon Brown based govn spending on the back of saying he had abolished the boom/bust business cycle in the UK, making no provisions...