Caron Lindsay

Government concedes key points on judicial review

By | Tue 13th January 2015 - 3:09 pm

As you know, we’ve been following the parliamentary ping pong on the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill. Today it comes back before the Commons and, as the Guardian reports, the Government has made concessions on three points:

The first concession, not related to judicial review, was over the introduction of disciplinary powers to be used for confining convicted boys under the age of 15 and women in secure colleges. The Ministry of Justice amendment has accepted that there would have to be a further vote on a statutory instrument before the powers could come into force – a safeguard that peers had sought. Labour said the concession was sufficient.

The government’s two other highly technical, judicial review amendments allow judges to make the final decision on whether to grant permission for a judicial review challenge, and allow judicial committees to decide at what financial level individuals who fund cases will have to be identified.

While those concessions will satisfy some of those who want to see more judicial  discretion in determining whether a judicial review can go ahead, others will feel that the use of the word exceptional is too much of a qualifier.

Liberal Democrats have been working behind the scenes to secure these changes since the last Lords debate a month ago. What Chris Grayling offers is the result of those negotiations. The Lords will have to determine whether they are sufficient. If they do, the ping pong will continue.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • TechnicalEphemera 13th Jan '15 - 7:28pm

    Doesn’t change the fact that it is still an awful bill, Grieve and Davis (Tories by the way) both spoke against it.

    Doesn’t change the fact that the Lib Dems had the opportunity to vote it down and instead voted for it.

    Not acceptable by any measure of decency, certainly not compatible with Liberal Democrat principles as I once understood them.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    “The challenge is not simply funding. It is that vocational education is still widely regarded as a second-choice option, while university remains the default...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Theakes @ Nonconformistradical You, too, are both missing the point. If the protesters were possibly guilty of grievous bodily harm, or whatever, then this...
  • Jana
    “The economy works beautifully for those at the top and barely at all for everyone else” You know this is a complete exaggeration. The vast majority of o...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Chloe, "Palastine (sic) is one of those – as a labour MP put it – middle class hobby horse subject. " I'd be probably be described as "Mi...
  • Nonconformistradical
    Quoting from today's Appeal Court ruling:- "Ammori had challenged the ban on the argument that the-then Home Secretary Yvette Cooper had not followed her own...