How well did the Democrats really do?

Unlike the UK, aggregate vote share figures across the US are rarely reported. But there have now been some unofficial calculations, which put the vote share in House of Representative elections at:

Democrats 51%
Republicans 47%

(Figure from MyDD.com, which also has more details.)

Read more by .
This entry was posted in LDVUSA.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Angus J Huck 19th Nov '06 - 12:54am

    Overall figures tend to be misleading because in many strongly Democrat Congressional districts the Republicans did not put up a candidate. (For instance, in Richmond VA, there was no Republican candidate. The Republicans had no chance of winning and didn’t want to encourage Democrats to turn out and vote Democrat at Senate level.)

    What is worrying for the Democrats is that the Democrat vote tends to be much more concentrated than the Republican vote. In many urban districts, the Democrats scored over 80% (eg, 96% in South Bronx, 94% in Harlem). The Republicans, by contrast, rarely managed more than 75%, even in solidly white rural areas in the South.

    One very interesting and indeed astonishing statistic. In Kentucky’s 5th District (one of the poorest in the country), the Republicans got 72%. Yet in Maryland’s 8th District (one of the wealthiest), the Democrats scored 74%.

    Full results may be found on the New York Times website.

  • Angus,

    Thanks for this but I don’t think anyone should understate how remarkable the Democrat’s wins were. Greg Palast has been digging hard and explains just how much of a labour of sysiphus electoral politics has become for the Dems.

    “For six years now, our investigations team, at first on assignment for BBC TV and the Guardian, has been digging into the nitty-gritty of the gaming of US elections.”

    Palast’s estimate is that on November 7, 2006…[some]…Four and a half million votes [were] shoplifted [from the Democrats].”

    If you want more of the details go to:

    In essence the four and a half million is made up as follows:

    1. Rejecting voters entitled to register.
    2. Making it very difficult to vote for likely Democrat supporters…from ethnic minorities.
    3. Ensuring that votes don’t get counted.

    State administrations have considerable power to corrupt the electoral process – it takes a veritable tidal wave of opposition to the Republicans to overcome that. The extent of the electoral fraud is quite shocking…it is , as Palast puts it the case that:

    “…the Republican Party [began] Election Day with a 4.5 million-vote thumb on the vote-tally scale.”

    Ed Randall

  • Angus – if you follow the link on my posting there are calculations done to adjust the figures for the very effect you mention. They don’t make much of a difference to the overall totals.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Chambers
    Paul, thanks for this incisive piece on the relationship between the Labour Party and the privation of state provision in the UK. I agree with much of what you ...
  • Carl Pierce
    Sam - Your not alone. Ill be ashamed if my party treats you unfairly....
  • Martin Eggleston
    @Tom Bailey we have our very own example in the UK; Wally Stott composed the Hancocks Half Hour theme tune and was the arranger for many Goon Shows, and albums ...
  • Peter Hirst
    Related to this concern for standards in nursery care, should we be looking at the metric of school readiness? It is shocking that so few children are ready for...
  • Peter Hirst
    Private ownership and full nationalisation are the two extremes of the possibilities for ownerhship of services delivered for a community with a variable monop...