Labour election leaflet unveils anti-foreigner shift in ID cards policy

As I blogged about a few days ago, the Labour Party in the Crewe and Nantwich by-election is attacking the Conservative candidate for opposing “making foreign nationals carry an ID card”. As I said then,

The use of the word “foreign” there seems to come with some rather unpleasant overtones in this context, the implication being that ‘ooh, foreigners – they’re terribly nasty aren’t they – so surely you can’t be against keeping tabs on them now, can you?’

But – as Alex has reminded me – there’s more to this than that. Because, you see, making foreign nationals carry an ID card hasn’t until now been Labour policy. Indeed, as the Home Office’s own website says at the time of writing:

Will it be compulsory to carry a card?
No.

That’s pretty clear really, isn’t it?

So what does this all mean?

One explanation of course is that Labour have got so desparate their leaflets are departing from the script and attacking other candidates for views that actually the Labour Party itself holds. Perish the thought.

The alternative? Well, that Labour have used the by-election to introduce a hasty change in their ID cards policy and gone for an (even more) macho anti-foreigner stance.

I do wonder, in that case, how many people in the Labour Party have been told that their policy has been changed in this way. Do you think, for example, that all the visiting Labour MPs have been told about this change? And I wonder if they are all happy with this extra anti-foreigner turn of screw slipped out during a by-election campaign?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Parliamentary by-elections.
Advert

9 Comments

  • Hywel Morgan 13th May '08 - 11:13am

    As Kinnock might have said:

    If Labour start to head towards defeat in 2009/10, I warn you not to look a bit foreign, I warn you not to be young, I warn you not to be poor and not a key swing voters group…..

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Watson 11th Dec - 2:59pm
    "The Election Manifestos of 2017 and 2019 are explicit on this matter." The problem with this "Liberal Democrat Party policy to bring forward legislation to...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 11th Dec - 2:38pm
    Agree with Chris Moore...... and frequently amazed by the lack of nous, common sense and sheer naivety of those calling the shots.
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 11th Dec - 2:21pm
    That's a well-argued article from Prospect Magazine that Peter Martin has linked. The concluding paragraph provide a good summation under the sub-heading A holistic approach:...
  • User Avatarchris moore 11th Dec - 2:18pm
    Mark Seaman 10th Dec '19 - 5:54pm No taxation without representation. But … to allow people the right to vote in elections when they live...
  • User Avatarchris moore 11th Dec - 1:55pm
    ...unitl that time, we will continue to poll poorly.
  • User Avatarchris moore 11th Dec - 1:54pm
    The switch to Revoke was a mistake. We were already well-established in the public mind as a very pro-European party. And we had a defensible...
Tue 7th Jan 2020