Mathew on Monday: It’s time to take big money out of British politics

If ever there were a moment to have a serious conversation about how we fund our politics, this is it.

In the space of just 48 hours, Reform UK received an extraordinary £72 million from two billionaire donors – £36 million apiece from crypto entrepreneurs Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne. Let me be clear: my argument isn’t that Reform should be singled out for rules that don’t apply to everybody else. The problem is the system itself.

At present, there is no overall limit on the amount a permissible donor can give to a political party. That means our democracy remains vulnerable to the simple fact that somebody with an enormous bank balance can attempt to wield a financial and potential political influence unavailable to the overwhelming majority of citizens. That cannot be healthy.

I believe the answer is a proper system of State funding of political parties, coupled with strict limits on large private donations. Yes, I can already hear the objection: why should taxpayers fund political parties they don’t support? But democracy isn’t free. We already publicly fund elements of our politics, including policy development grants and parliamentary support such as Short Money. The principle has therefore already been established.

A properly designed system could allocate funding according to electoral support while retaining a modest role for membership fees and individual donations. It would mean parties spending less time courting wealthy benefactors and more time trying to persuade voters. And it would help to create something liberals should instinctively support: a more level political playing field. Democracy should ultimately be a contest of ideas, values and visions for our country’s future. It should never be a contest to see which political party can attract the billionaire with the biggest chequebook.

The Reform donations should be the moment Britain finally decides to get big money out of politics.

A setback, but the fight for dignity goes on

I was deeply saddened on Friday when MPs voted down the Assisted Dying Bill by 286 votes to 270. For terminally ill people who want choice, dignity and control at the end of life, this was a bitter setback.

But the fight goes on. At Lib Dem Conference in Brighton on Sunday, I’ll be chairing Dignity in Dying’s fringe meeting, ‘What’s next for the Assisted Dying Bill.’, Sunday, 20th September, 12.15-1.15pm, Brighton Centre, Meeting Room 1B.

With a Lib Dem MP, a Lib Dem Peer, the CEO of Dignity in Dying and people with lived experience of the issue well discuss how we regroup, rebuild and continue campaigning for a compassionate change in the law. Because this cause isn’t going away and true choice at the end of life will win.

I hope you can join us.

See you in Brighton!

I always love party conference. Getting to see so many friends, old and new, and debating liberal solutions to the big domestic and global challenges we face.

As well as chairing the fringe referenced above, I’ll also be doing some media.

But what I look forward to most is chatting to members of our wonderfully diverse Lib Dem family. So, if you spot me, do say hello and let’s have a cuppa.

And join me back here next week for Mathew on Monday at Conference.

See you in Brighton!

* Mathew Hulbert is a former Councillor, is a regular commentator on TV and Radio, and is Co-Host of the Political Frenemies podcast.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

One Comment

  • The 2 big parties – Labour and Conservative – spent almost £55 Million between them during the 2024 General election while ReformUK could only afford to spend around £5 Million. You can understand why super-rich supporters wishing to help ReformUK complete on a level playing field would realise that £30 Million would be needed to ensure their Party could match the big 2 parties spending at the next election.

    That said, the fact that the main parties rely on multimillion donations to allow them to compete in an election is a stain on our democracy. We need to put a cap on what Parties can spend during elections in addition to the cap on spending in individual constituencies. Once this is done, it is reasonable to limit the amount that can be donated to a political party each year. Taxpayers having to pay for political parties should not be considered.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    The 2 big parties - Labour and Conservative - spent almost £55 Million between them during the 2024 General election while ReformUK could only afford to spend ...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Thanks for a most relevant and interesting article! Might the following policies be liberal in their content and democratic in their practices? 1) Univers...
  • Owen Driscoll
    The party needs to ditch fairness and the veil of ignorance. And focus more on Mills harm principles instead of Rawls. Rawls is deontological, Mill is consequen...
  • Adam
    "Labour and the Greens want to do things for you, the Conservatives and Reform want to do things to you, but the Liberal Democrats want to do things along with ...
  • John Payne
    Thanks to Tom for a broad brush summary of how attitudes to what has happened in Palestine have changed since the formation of the state of Israel. However, I ...