Independent says “Lib Dems go beyond meaning well”

Today’s Independent editorial has some heartening words about the approach of Liberal Democrats within the Government and our ongoing policy making process.

The background to the motion on childcare is explored:

Hence the party’s plan to extend free childcare to all one- and two-year-olds, which we report on today, is no well-meaning wishlist, but a battle-hardened piece of legislation-ready policy.

The plan emerges from the struggle between the coalition partners over the last spending round, which was announced by George Osborne, the Chancellor, in June. Nick Clegg pushed for a better childcare deal, but eventually had to concede that NHS, schools and infrastructure spending were higher priorities. However, the result is that Lib Dem ministers were forced to refine their ideas, which means that the motion from the party’s Federal Policy Committee has been thought through.

And there’s acknowledgement of a key achievement in Government and a look forward to the manifesto:

One of the little-appreciated decisions made by the Lib Dems at an early stage of the spending round was that it would cover one year only, 2015-16. That frees the coalition parties to set out different tax and spending priorities for the next parliament. Thus we can see the Lib Dem manifesto for the election coming into shape. Extending taxpayer-funded childcare will be one plank of the platform. Another is the mansion tax, for which Mr Clegg pushed but which David Cameron ruled out emphatically. A third example is that the Lib Dem leadership has admitted its error in allowing the extension of secret courts in the Justice and Security Act to go through and now wants to pledge to reverse it if it were returned to government.

Of course, there’s the obligatory prediction about how coalition negotiations will proceed:

The hardening of Lib Dem policy-making, which is still more democratic than that of the other main parties, means that disasters such as the tuition fees U-turn would be less likely. It also provides a more solid basis on which to conduct coalition negotiations, should there be another hung parliament. And what is interesting about the childcare policy and the mansion tax is that they are both subjects on which it is easier to imagine Labour and the Lib Dems reaching agreement than a continuation of the present coalition.

Indeed, The Independent on Sunday could support both policies. Good quality childcare, free at the point of provision, is a liberating option to offer parents. And it should be universal, to ensure that it does not become a poor service for poor people – unlike the current provision for two-year-olds, which is restricted to families on low incomes.

 

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • OK. So far, so good. But how much readership does Independent on Sunday have? It is to be hoped that such good policy making will appeal also to the Guardian/Observer and even The Times.

    The Su n, The Mail and The Express? Probably not. Pigs might fly.

    Paul King.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Steve J Smith
    Even Save The Children are against this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S47oBPzphCw TechDirt did a very good piece on it too. There's no evidence that kids ar...
  • David Warren
    Great initiative. I have filled in the questionaire and would urge all other members to do so!...
  • John Barrett
    Until big tech companies are forced to remove dangerous content from their social media platforms children need to be protected, and one way to do that is to st...
  • Nonconformistradical
    " In fact, most rich people employed clever tax avoidance experts to create and find loopholes, and thereby dodge their tax bills." Isn't this justification ...
  • Chloe
    Mick; Debate and discussion lead to a majority of just 23. There's very strong opinions on either side. And parliamentarians should not be giving out emotive ex...