Inside Syria’s torture chambers

The Guardian reports:

Adnan, a young Syrian professional in his thirties, tells of his experience as one of hundreds detained in President Bashar al-Assad’s crackdown on dissent…

The whole experience is built around humiliation. We were blindfolded. We were shouted at. We were only allowed to the toilet once a day, for three seconds. We had to strip down to our underwear and someone would stand outside the door counting. If you didn’t finish within three seconds you were beaten. I often didn’t go; I was too worried. We were given water and food, but you don’t want to drink when you can’t go to the toilet.

We were taken out of the cell to be beaten and I was interrogated several times. One time they took us to a room with an electric chair. I said no, this is too much, not this. They didn’t use it but they have one – I saw it with my own eyes. They accused me of working for foreign gangs. They were angry about videos of the protests being leaked and they searched everyone’s phones. They finally decided to let me go in the early hours of the morning, exhausted and bruised and battered. It was a horrible experience. This regime is brutal but also stupid. Everyone in there said they were angrier, not more afraid. You cannot forgive a regime that does this to you.”

News of brutality in Syria is regrettably unsurprising and hardly new. But is the international community right to take a much more hand-off approach than it has in Libya and (eventually) in the Ivory Coast? Is this sensible pragmatism about what can or can’t be done or is there more that should be done? The comments thread awaits…

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • In direct answer to the question posed, no the international community is not right to cherry pick which brutal dictators / regimes it stands up to. The UN is useless and no longer fit for purpose. But with Russia and China as permanent members of the Security Council it can hardly be considered a guardian of the oppressed….

    As for Libya, I would think the assasination attempt made recently resulting in the death of one of Gaddaffi’s sons has gone so far over the mandate on protecting civilians that it should be investigated as a possible war crime. The regime and its leader are beneath contempt, but the party that led many protests about the legality of Iraq should not allow NATO to stray from its legitimate mission.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Nigel Jones
    Yes we need to think through and articulate our Lib dem approach to economics and the way we order society. I see the occasional attempt at this on LDV but out ...
  • Peter Davies
    The broken part is not the provision of water (a commodity and natural monopoly supplied to households) but the disposal of sewage and rain water run-off (a ser...
  • Cassie
    'Knee jerk adoption.. (be it mutuals instead of corporates) does not address the fundamental strategic problems'. Indeed. Dŵr Cymru Welsh Water is not-for-pro...
  • Peter Chambers
    I would like to agree that the "It" is the Royal Navy. But I cannot. The necessary "It" is Social Democracy. The National Preparedness Commission said in the...
  • Rif Winfield
    Whatever the multiple roles which the Navy must undertake (and here I fully agree with you, Edward), what is essential is the quantity of vessels. However effec...