Is there no end to this outbreak of health and safety sanity?

The stories about legal accuracy and common sense when it comes to snow clearing just keep on breaking out this year:

CLAIMS that ‘elf and safety’ rules mean you could be sued if someone slips on the pavement after you have cleared it of snow have been dismissed by Taunton-based lawyers. (Somerset County Gazette)


Alex Salmond urged people to clear snow and ice outside their homes. He said: “There is no truth whatsoever that there is any risk of being sued if you clear the pavement outside your premises or house. (Daily Record)

Both of which follow the outbreak a few days ago in Merseyside.

Snow tracksAll in all, thanks in large part to the government’s clear and sane advice this year, it looks like the myth that you shouldn’t clear snow from outside your home because you’ll end up getting sued is now well and truly killed off in the media rather than (as in previously years) regularly reported by the media as gospel.

So on my Christmas wish for next year, how about rather more shops taking clearing snow outside their own premises a little more seriously…?

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.


  • You’ll be supporting the Snow Clearance Bill 2010-11 then? The Bill will make it illegal for anyone to be prosecuted for clearing snow from public places.

  • Speaking of outbreaks, I’m getting error messages/programme not responding when I come onto this site now.

  • Quite, the health and safety bashing has long been silly and it was hardly ever legislation to blame in the silly cases, just people not wanting to do things.

    @RichardSM which browser are you running and do you have the latest version of Flash installed?

  • “I’d support a bill that set out what you can and can’t do, and give obligations on people to clear their paths and similar if possible, but a blanket amnesty is removing the ability to deal with idiots that think water and bleach are good solutions.”

    And therein lies the problem. Drafting that legislation would be horrendously difficult. The law in this area (standard common law negligence) has been around for donkeys years, is well tested by precedent – illustrated by the fact that a lawyer summarised it in one paragraph without any qualfications 🙂

    The fact that there doesn’t seem to be a single case of someone being successfully sued for negligently clearing a path (I haven’t checked but I’ve never seen one referenced) seems to speak for itself.

  • Last winter a County Council employee (wearing high heals) slipped and fractured her ankle on the local Community Centre car park (Borough Council property). She gained compensation through a no win no fee solicitor.
    It had been policy not to grit the car park over the last 20 years.
    Borough Council insurers caved in and paid up when the solicitor found that the Borough did grit other car parks.
    The lady did admit that high heals were not the best choice considering the weather.
    Is this a case of the insurance company caving in on economic rather than legal grounds? Cheaper to pay up than fight a case.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMack 26th Feb - 2:24am
    There are some good ideas here, but I think that joining them together is probably important to seriously tackle this issue. Building more houses, regardless...
  • User AvatarYousuf Farah 26th Feb - 1:53am
    What you allude to in your article as a way to preserve the union whilst keeping dialogue with the SNP, is untenable. It would make...
  • User AvatarManfarang 26th Feb - 1:39am
    With the British economy failing under Johnson the number of British people seeking employment overseas is set to increase.
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 26th Feb - 1:01am
    But what is Unique to the Lib Dems about building more houses? Every party is in favour of it - the Conservatives because it will...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 26th Feb - 12:22am
    @TCO But private sector housing is more expensive. So a Council Tenant who is being financially hit by the Bedroom Tax is, according to you,...
  • User AvatarBen Rattigan 25th Feb - 11:15pm
    I cannot agree with this. Why? Mission Creep That's what happened with Labour plans and why I switched from Labour to LibDem. Govts can't help...