Is this the laziest piece of political journalism ever?

Well, no, it’s probably not. But it must at least qualify for the laziest piece of journalism this decade. I refer to today’s Independent article, ‘Clegg faces party backlash over Tory alliance’, by Nigel Morris and Michael Savage. Oh, go on, then, here’s a link if you must; though I begrudge handing them the traffic. The opening para gives a flavour of the kite-flying, unsourced speculation:

Nick Clegg faces a backlash from grassroots Liberal Democrats if he moves his party too close to the Conservatives in a hung parliament.

Well, yes, he probably would. Which is why he won’t. Unless the Tories are prepared to implement key Lib Dem policies. Which they won’t. Can’t put it much clearer, can I?

But back to Messrs Morris and Savage: what evidence do they supply to justify their suggestion that Nick faces a ‘backlash’ from Lib Dem activists?

Three are offered. The first is the most recent LDV readers’ poll result (though they don’t have the grace to acknowledge it): ‘Their centre-left sympathies were made clear in a poll last week which asked activists to choose between Mr Brown and Mr Cameron for Prime Minister after the election. Their verdict was definitive: 58 per cent named the Tory leader as the worst option, with 42 per cent for Mr Brown.’

As I wrote at the time of the 1,000+ readers who voted: ‘I never tire of reminding folk – especially any journos on the look-out for an easy story – [they] may or may not all be Lib Dems.’ The Indy just preferred to assume they are.

The second piece of evidence offered by the Indy was a flawed, misleading, dated poll for the BBC’s Daily Politics which LDV has already debunked in some depth here.

And the final piece of evidence? Some random, de-contextualised quotes from Lib Dem bloggers:

Christopher Lovell, president of Leeds Liberal Youth, said: “A Conservative government will pursue fundamentally different objectives from a Liberal Democrat one and, although there may be an … overlap in policy, many Liberal Democrats would find it hard to support even a small amount of what a Tory government tried to do.”

Jane Watkinson
said: “Both parties are a compromise to what we stand for but, if it came down to it, Labour are closer to our values as we do share common ground in aspects such as constitutional reform and taxes.”

A blogger from Norfolk wrote: “Yawning gaps exist between the Liberal Democrats and the Tories on many issues, and David Cameron knows this. So why did he make his statement?”

(I love, by the way, that the Indy couldn’t even be quite bothered enough to find the identity of the ‘blogger from Norfolk’, who will need no introduction to the Lib Dem blogging community as Nich Starling).

No reason they shouldn’t be quoted, of course: all are fine bloggers. But it’s pushing it to suggest that their quotes – or any of the others that might have been filletted from other blogs – somehow constitute a ‘backlash’ against Nick Clegg.

In short, this was nothing more than an over-hasty, content-free and careless cuttings-job. The Indy can do better, much better. Fortunately they still do, sometimes. So let me finish on a positive note, with this clipping from Steve Richards in today’s same edition, And the first-round winner is… Clegg:

Perhaps the struggle to shape credible election winning messages in a recession explains why Brown and Cameron both stress similarities with the Liberal Democrats. For Nick Clegg there is one tiny danger in the love-in. If voters believe Cameron’s tendentious claim that his party has moved closer to Clegg’s they might find it easier to vote Conservative in seats currently held by the Liberal Democrats. But on the whole Clegg should be jumping with joy at this latest twist.

Cameron and Brown flatter him and the media will take note by paying him more respectful attention. Such flattery has not happened to a leader of a third party before. Blair wooed Paddy Ashdown in 1997, but John Major did not do so. In 1992 neither Kinnock, nor Major showed any public affection for the Lib Dems.

Clegg has both Cameron and Brown taking him seriously. Finally he is in the game. As a significant bonus Labour goes into the election calling for a change in the voting system. Some of Brown’s advisers urge him to make more of this, to declare at every opportunity that if Labour wins this will be the last election under “first past the post”.

Brown cannot bring himself to do so with any great enthusiasms because he is no enthusiast. It does not matter. The commitment is made. … Clegg is the winner of these early skirmishes and he has hardly uttered a word.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

9 Comments

  • To the question of”why did Camerom say this”

    He knows that the grassroot members will never change, but he knows voters of all the parties have a number that could switch, and these are the ones he is talking to. These people do not come onto sites like these, but will just pick up bits of news off the TV news.

    I feel the LibDem attacks on the tory party is one reason that the only movement in the polls is between the LibDem %, and the Labour one. The Tory one is stuck on 40%, and to get second place in the election there should be a stronger attack on the Labour party. Voters seeing a party moving forward are more likely to stay with them.

  • David Allen 6th Jan '10 - 12:03pm

    Indy: “Nick Clegg faces a backlash from grassroots Liberal Democrats if he moves his party too close to the Conservatives in a hung parliament.”

    Stephen Tall: “Well, yes, he probably would. Which is why he won’t.”

    Stephen, my fear is that you may well be precisely correct there!

  • David Allen – I’m confused. Are you saying that Nick shouldn’t consider the grassroots POV? Or are you saying that that POV is the only thing stopping him?

  • David Allen 6th Jan '10 - 3:53pm

    Tabman, I’m saying that it may only be his fear of a grassroots backlash that will prevent Nick from tilting toward the Tories. Perhaps you’d share that view?

  • OK – but from your POV isn’t that a Good Thing?

    My own POV is that NC has not made any encouraging noises towards the Tories.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • expats
    Does mammon have a soul?...
  • John Hall
    A good article given shortage of space. Could have mentioned the incalculable international support that Israel gets particularly from the USA, both financial...
  • Alex Macfie
    @James Young: Well we are certainly taking Chesham & Amersham seriously. Yes, Hartlepool and Airdie & Shotts were dreadful results for us but we were ne...
  • Andy Boddington
    Roger Lake. I take the point without fully agreeing with it. There is a need to show precision. I follow a convention where no decimal points are quoted above t...
  • Andrew Tampion
    "The Conservative Party did well, however the Welsh Assembly elections and the elections to the Scottish Parliament clearly demonstrate that their influence in ...