Ooops.
A very silly mistake, courtesy of www.ealingsouthallconservatives.org.uk
Click on the thumbnail and read the text next to the cross I’ve added.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat An Iranian Who’s Who (Tom Arms)
-
The Independent View: Are mutuals the answer to the water crisis? (People's Commission on the Water Sector)
-
William Wallace writes: We should talk more about Liberalism (Lord William Wallace)
-
The future of war has arrived: It’s the Navy (Edward Marsh)
-
Why you should read old election manuals
-
Boy the home office tried to deport at 9 wins British chess championship at 17
-
The Joy of Six 1559
-
The Coasters: Yakety Yak
-
Clacton ad infinitum
-
Which is the most unworkable policy?
-
Neo-Nazi and net zero
-
A blue plaque for Traffic's Jim Capaldi in Marlow
-
For International Cat Day: This is Sylvia by Sandy Wilson
-
From copperworks to distillery
Recent Comments
Simon Horsman
I've not looked at the agenda in depth but although it seems most worthy I saw little on the economy, taxes and money. Resources are not sufficient but they ar...
Peter Chambers
> J.D. Vance, Steve Witkoff, Jared Kushner This would be Mr Angry, the Steve who went to Moscow and trusted the Russians to do his translation, and the New...
Richard Whelan
We are gioing down slowly in the polls too. Why? Is it because we currently have nothing to offer other than the odd soundbite that no one remembers....
Pawel Urbanski
Picking up Mark's point, because I don't think it's a small one. Conference is where members top up the energy and motivation that carries both local and nation...
Julie Walkling
Great agenda, including party strategy and defending democracy. Especially pleased to see debate about ending violence against women and girls as this is a huge...
7 Comments
Would hate to think this has anything to do with his business acumen..
Was that + or – £4800 to labour party,
and that 3.19pct increase to the libdems was invisible…
these new political games are now beginning to bore me….
if they want to say that they’re the only party increasing their % (which is not true), they could have at least not published the full results below with changes showing that their previous line is not accurate
I read a couple of posters on Politicalbetting.com trying to spin such rubbish after the result came in. Why is politics filled with such blatant liars?
Grant was trying to push that line last night before the results had come in. “The party to make the biggest increase in vote” I think was his phrase.
I must commend you for lending the Tories the guy who draws your bar graphs in their hour of need – that’s most charitable of you.
Talk of Grant 1234 Shapps as some kind of Tory Rennard is such a joke. He is a walking electoral disaster zone. Best of all was his line that all 3rd place parties get squeezed – err, tell that to the LibDems in Sedgefield who pushed the Tory candidate from 2nd place to 3rd. What a Tory idiot!
I can’t help remembering the Labour MP on TV on the night of the Bermondsey by-election (sorry – I’m showing my age!) trying to argue that the real news was how badly the Tories had done.