Take a look at this. I think that the best that can be said is that the information provided about each person is a little, shall we say, sparse?
And it says something interesting about the priorities in Labour HQ that this person has far more information given about them 🙂
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Pensions and social care: Ed Davey must offer more than reassurance (Maria Linforth-Hall)
What is happening with the Inclusion and Faith Review? (Simon McGrath)
We need a healthy and free leadership debate (Rosemary Runswick)
Mathew on Monday: Davey has been given a second chance. Now he must show us what his leadership is for (Mathew Hulbert)
The decapitation strategy (Michael Taylor)
Labour to shun pacts with Greens
How many councillors has Reform UK lost since the May 2026 elections?
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a man falling off a paddleboard - for ever
Lord Bonkers 30 years ago: David Chidgey in the Bird of Liberty
Gophers! - The strange strange show that no one remembers
Delivering in Whickham
Councillor Samantha Williamson joins Lib Dems in Bolton
Senedd bans poem by Wales National Poet
When will reality bite in Wales?
Sarah 
Hywel 
Jason Connor 
Jana Hywel 
7 Comments
Also, Tony Blair’s still down as an MP 😛
It is also quite difficult to find anything from the Labour site. A while ago I wanted to know who’s their candidate in a certain constituency, but I couldn’t find neither a list of candidates, nor a list of local parties. I don’t believe that many others can.
I know because I work in public affairs that Labour keeps its PPC list secret, unlike the two other main parties, which make information about their PPCs and their contact details publicly available. Labour is by far the least e-savvy party.
Perhaps they have figured out, that it is wisest to keep their candidates secret as long as possible, before other parties can dig out all the dirt they have been involved.
“Tony Blair’s still down as an MP”
They also have Clare Short as a Labour MP
… (comment 4), that is most probably the case, but it’s hardly in keeping with the openness of the internet. In fact it’s highly indicative of their general approach to things: the words secrecy and control come to mind.
It’s because they sell information like details about their MPs and local parties, so they can’t give away too much information for free. Profits come before providing the public with information.