Take a look at this. I think that the best that can be said is that the information provided about each person is a little, shall we say, sparse?
And it says something interesting about the priorities in Labour HQ that this person has far more information given about them đ
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
What’s going on with party strategy? (Caron Lindsay)
We do have a two-tier system (Neil Hickman)
Observations of an Expat: NATO Irony (Tom Arms)
What really happened? (Simon Banks)
Why community politics matters (Mark Corner)
Remembering Liz Truss and her dogs that barked at drones
We do have a two-tier policing system but it is not what our homegrown racists think it is.
Lib Dems are reviewing policy and strategy says PoliticsHome
From Norman settlement to a civic square
Northern Ireland debates the future of its railways in 1957
"The old savage England": D.H. Lawrence visits the Stiperstones
Church Green video
Doing my bit at Whickham Church Green
Have a goat day tomorrow!
Ruth Bright 
Tom Bailey 
Alex Macfie 
William Wallace Alex Macfie 
7 Comments
Also, Tony Blair’s still down as an MP đ
It is also quite difficult to find anything from the Labour site. A while ago I wanted to know who’s their candidate in a certain constituency, but I couldn’t find neither a list of candidates, nor a list of local parties. I don’t believe that many others can.
I know because I work in public affairs that Labour keeps its PPC list secret, unlike the two other main parties, which make information about their PPCs and their contact details publicly available. Labour is by far the least e-savvy party.
Perhaps they have figured out, that it is wisest to keep their candidates secret as long as possible, before other parties can dig out all the dirt they have been involved.
“Tony Blairâs still down as an MP”
They also have Clare Short as a Labour MP
… (comment 4), that is most probably the case, but it’s hardly in keeping with the openness of the internet. In fact it’s highly indicative of their general approach to things: the words secrecy and control come to mind.
It’s because they sell information like details about their MPs and local parties, so they can’t give away too much information for free. Profits come before providing the public with information.