Councillor faces standards censure for posting council meeting footage on YouTube

Brighton & Hove City Council webcasts many of its meetings and makes the footage available for people to watch again afterwards. Cllr Jason Kitcat (Green) extracted from the footage examples of himself asking questions, put the footage on YouTube and blogged about the questions on his own site.

He only used footage the council has already made available, he didn’t alter the footage and he had a good reason for using his own copy rather than the council’s original (because at the time the council’s way of presenting the footage made it hard for people to go direct to a specific point in the coverage of a long meeting).

YouTube logoAll in all a good example of a councillor using the internet to communicate with the public, perhaps? The story here being that the councillor is up for some sort of award maybe?


Instead Cllr Ted Kemble (Conservative) lodged a standards complaint, saying that Jason Kitcat had failed to treat fellow councillors with respect and that he had breached Brighton and Hove City Council’s copyright. A local standards committee hearing upheld the complaint, and so Jason Kitcat appealed with a further hearing due in the autumn at the Local Governments Standards in England Tribunal. You can read more about the story in the e-government bulletin.

The case is a great illustration of how the standards regime has got horribly out of control – and how right the coalition government is to have announced the abolition of the Standards Board for England. What the case also highlights is how the details of that abolition need to be got right if we’re not simply to be left with a whole series of unwelcome local standards rulings instead.

UPDATE: Jason Kitcat was subsequently cleared.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Local government, News and Online politics.


  • Chris Keating 3rd Sep '10 - 4:39pm

    Council meetings are a load of waffle.

    In Cllr Kitcat’s case, the waffle is layered with cream before being coated in milk chocolate.

    Nevertheless, I wish him well with this insane standards board ruling…

  • Andrew Suffield 3rd Sep '10 - 7:20pm

    Well, that’s stupid.

    Apart from the blinding idiocy (what on earth are they attempting to accomplish), copyright only exists in creative works. Nothing remotely creative has ever happened at a council meeting.

  • Christopher Hawtree 4th Sep '10 - 10:11am

    This piece does not mention that a libDem, Cllr David Watkins, was one of those who imposed this ludicrous sentence upon Clly Kitcat. The LibDems are therefore a piece with the Tories’ aiming of reducing the Greens on the Council by one for six months and being able to push through their wretched policies.

  • John L Oakes The council has a duty to communicate with its residents, and there is no obvious “lack of respect”; so unless there are details we haven’t been given, or Cllr Kitcat is badly represented, it should be pretty easy to overturn this on appeal – at, however, considerable expense to the public.And Cllr Kitcat should be able to reclaim his expenses from the council, if it is finally decided that he did not breach its Code of Conduct.
    But the story does illustrate that LOCALLY-ELECTED Standards Boards are far from being the impartial bodies they are touted as; and that they often operate at the behest of a politically-biased Head of Legal Department.
    Why, one wonders, is Coalition partner Kemble and his Group launching this attack? I am pretty sad to hear that a LibDem councillor was one of the accusers……

  • Terry Gilbert 10th Sep '10 - 10:54pm

    Disgraceful if a Lib Dem is backing up the Tories on this.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Nonconformistradical
    @Martin Frost "How many of the pro-mask studies refer to the use of paper masks and their effectiveness? Those I have read refer to surgical or respiratory mas...
  • Martin Frost
    Some questions from this alleged libertarian? How many of the pro-mask studies refer to the use of paper masks and their effectiveness? Those I have read re...
  • Lorenzo Cherin
    Brilliant level of effort from Matt , hardly surprising, but needed! And much the same here, from Cassie, with articulate defence of Liberal not libertarian...
  • Jeff
    expats 25th Oct '21 - 6:00pm: …thanks for your ‘Why Vote Leave’ link..I’d actually forgotten how much ‘rubbish’ it was… Rubbish ...
  • matt
    @Jeff Thank you for posting that. Considering the state our public health system is in at the moment an 18% reduction in infections for "mask wearers" in ...
Thu 28th Oct 2021