John Howell selected by Conservatives for Henley by-election

Earlier tonight, John Howell was selected by the Conservatives to be their candidate in the Henley by-election. His selection has been welcomed by Stephen Kearney from the Liberal Democrats, who has already been hard at work on the Henley by-election campaign trail for several weeks:

After a difficult selection process [a reference to this], the Conservatives have settled on County Councillor John Howell as their candidate in the forthcoming by-election.

The Liberal Democrats have welcomed the news of the selection of John Howell. Liberal Democrat candidate and charity boss Stephen Kearney said: “I am looking forward to debating the issues that affect people across the Henley constituency with Councillor John Howell in the coming weeks.

“Our campaign has been up and running for several weeks, Nick Clegg has surveyed the entire constituency and we are getting a very warm reception on doorsteps. We are ready for the Conservatives to fire the starting gun whenever they are ready to provide local people with a date.” 

John Howell is an Oxfordshire County Councillor, which means his and the Conservative Party’s record on the county council is now likely to come under very close scrutiny. Indeed, the party’s own press release on John Howell’s selection states:

Liberal Democrat Deputy Director of Campaigns Neil Fawcett said:

“We are delighted that the Conservatives have settled on Councillor John Howell. The selection of a senior County Councillor will provide local people with the chance to have their say on rising Council Tax bills and the Conservatives’ record in Oxfordshire.

Stephen Kearney will be a strong voice for local people. He has an excellent track record of listening to local communities as part of his charity work. Stephen has already taken up a number of local issues such as the loss of local services, expansion onto the green belt and anti-social behaviour.”

UPDATE: John Howell has now come under scrutiny for his links to property developers.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Keith R Mitchell CBE 31st May '08 - 1:38am

    John Howell will make a great successor to Michael Heseltine and Boris Johnson.

  • “Nick Clegg has surveyed the entire constituency”

    Busy chap then . . . .

  • “Kearney has NOT done “charity work””

    Really Paul. You should know that telling the corner shop owner to put your 2p change in the collection jar is elevated to “charity work” in LibDem leaflet land.

    It ranks alongside “an election expert” being reported in their newspapers saying that the LibDems are well placed to win the seat. The “election expert” being Lord Rennard and the voters never told that he is a LibDem Lord.

    Just another of the little dishonest techniques the sneaky party use.

  • john howell 5th Jun '08 - 9:51pm

    I welcome my namesake being nominated as it is high time that a john howell receives recognition in government affairs. Like Councillor Howell, I too work for OCC and despite occasional mix ups between us in terms of e mailing, I am standing aside to allow him to take on the role. I will settle for a PCC seat.

  • A letter to the Oxford Mail alleges:
    “I have just received a letter from Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg urging me to apply for a postal vote at the Henley by-election and to return the application form to the Liberal Democrats in Oxford”

    Surely that can’t be true?

  • Chris Paul is wrong.

    People employed by charities are paid substantially less than counterparts in the for-profit sector.

    Paid charity work involves a substantial element of sacrifice.

    Ask Frank Field MP.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Martin
    " As auntie appears to annoy politicos every stripe they must be doing something right." This is a lazy and dangerous line of argument: it merely enco...
  • David Evans
    I was sad to say that while the Thornhill report was tough in its findings and its conclusions, in all honesty it wasn't anything like tough enough, and its rec...
  • James Baillie
    I'm currently disinclined to support the proposals. I'm concerned about whether the "scrutiny committee" will have a meaningful enough role: we've seen with the...
  • Matt McLaren
    Thanks Callum, I agree that the Federal Board needs to be slimmed down and that the specific proposals coming to Spring Conference do very much provide for a de...
  • Paul Barker
    For me the crucial factor here is Size : large bodies are useless at making decisions. Conference needs to Vote for smaller bodies if we are serious. Clear dec...