Kettering Tory MP Philip Hollobone in ‘clean coal’ directorship row

A press release from the Kettering Lib Dems drops into the Voice’s email inbox:

Liberal Democrats in Kettering have demanded answers from Kettering’s Conservative MP Philip Hollobone – after a BBC investigation suggested that he broke parliamentary rules on declaring his financial interests.

The Conservative MP receives between £15,001 and £20,000 per year as a non-executive director of a ‘clean coal’ company, in addition to his elected roles as a member of parliament and a Kettering borough councillor. Since taking up this role in January 2007, the BBC investigation found that he had asked three questions in Parliament about ‘clean coal’ technology without declaring his financial interests.

Parliamentary rules require all MPs to declare their personal financial interests when tabling parliamentary questions or speaking in debates, as well as publishing this information in the register of members’ interests.

“The people of Kettering constituency need a member of parliament that they can trust to represent them and who put their needs above the needs of lobbyists,” said Kettering Liberal Democrat spokesperson Alan Window .

“By asking questions in which he seems to have a clear financial stake – and then apparently breaking parliamentary rules by not declaring that stake – Philip Hollobone’s behaviour is very disappointing,” he continued.

“Not only does he have some very serious questions to answer about his role at this company, his very decision to take up this directorship will cause many to question his judgment and his impartiality. If Philip Hollobone really wants to clean up British politics, he should start by resigning this directorship and becoming the full-time MP we elected him to be!”

Notes:

The House of Commons Register of Members’ Interests shows that since 9 th January 2007, Philip Hollobone MP has been paid between £15,001 and £20,000 pa as a non-executive director for Nviro Cleantech plc, described as being “engaged in clean coal and other environmental technologies”. source

Non-partisan website They Work For You – which collates records of parliamentary questions and debates – indicates that since taking up his directorship with Nviro Cleantech on 9 th January 2007, Philip Hollobone asked two questions in October 2007 and spoke in a parliamentary debate on 23rd April 2009, all on the subject of clean coal

The full House of Commons Code of Conduct on declaring MPs’ interest can be seen here

In tabling written parliamentary questions, paragraphs 60 and 61 of the Code of Conduct require MPs to declare any relevant financial interests at the same time as tabling the question – which is then marked “[R]” on the order paper. The BBC reports that no declaration was made on these questions. This is confirmed by the lack of the symbol “[R]” next to the question on the order paper.

In taking part in parliamentary debates, paragraph 59 requires MPs to make a brief statement declaring any relevant financial interests as part of their speech. The record of proceedings confirms no declaration was made

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Martin Kinsella 13th Jun '09 - 11:29am

    Hollo-bonehead has been holed below the waterline.

  • Doesn’t Hollobone have the least expense claims?

  • Hollobone does indeed claim the least in total, because he does NOT employ any staff at all, anywhere, to help with his MP, nor Councillor, work. He also doesnt travel first class on the train from Kettering to London

  • David Linger 14th Jul '09 - 11:16am

    The Lib Dems are getting desperate if they try to have a pop at the MP that has the lowest expenses record in the house of commons and has the foresight to be involved in a company that is promoting green clean energy and environmental technologies. The Lib Dems know they have no chance of beating Mr Hollobone in the election so they just try and smear his extremely good name. For once we have here a MP that works hard for The people of Kettering constituency and does not abuse the expenses like the other 600+. Mr Hollobone is one of the most respected MP’s at the house of commons.

  • Malcolm Todd 14th Jul '09 - 1:42pm

    To excuse non-declaration of interest on the basis of an MP’s low level of expense claims betrays the sheer wrong-headedness of much of the debate about expenses. True corruption is selling public services (in parliamentarians’ case, essentially their votes and voice in parliamentary debate) for private gain, as with the Labour peers offering to influence legislation in return for ‘consultancy fees’. Declaration of financial interest is a minimum protection against such corruption; failure to declare creates a suspicion that corruption exists. Whether Mr Hollobone claims public money to assist him in his public duties is irrelevant to this issue.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Greg Hyde
    We have moved heaven and earth to try to shift the economic stats of this area, but many people are still struggling,” said Richard Crook, the head of regener...
  • Lyell Yardarms
    The short Newsnight film where Nick Clegg visited Blaenau Gwent in late 2016 was very instructive. Millions and millions of pounds of Objective 1 funding has be...
  • Mick Scholes
    "It is rather similar to World War 2, when neither we nor Nazi Germany used poison gas, because both parties were aware of what it had done in WW1 and both part...
  • Dominic
    I agree with Amin (again!). If anything, having the capability to counter an enemy’s (hypothetical) use of tactical nukes reduces the risk that the enemy woul...
  • Dominic
    Not for the first time, I completely agree with Amin. The choice to end your life should be entirely your own and not impeded because someone else doesn’t lik...