The Watford Labour Party has published a members’ newsletter and placed a copy online. In the report of May’s local elections it reads:
In the Mayoral election, Nigel Bell came a close second.
Which is strange. Because in the vote for Watford’s elected mayor, won for the third time by Lib Dem Dorothy Thornhill, Labour’s candidate Nigel Bell didn’t come second, close or otherwise. He came third.
In the first ballot of the AV election, the votes were:
- Nigel Bell (Labour) 10,029
- Steve Johnson (Conservative) 10,403
- Alex Macgregor Mason (Green) 2,173
- Dorothy Thornhill (LibDem) 19,153
After the votes in this AV election were transferred, Dorothy Thornhill had a total of 23,429 votes and the Conservative candidate had 11,508 votes. Nobody was a close second, least of all Nigel Bell, who was a distant third.
Oh well, this is the Labour Party who in the same newsletter described Labour’s Claire Ward plummeting from first to third place as ‘a resilient General Election vote’.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
A perpetual pirouette of prevarication?
Michael Meadowcroft: A Liberal of Intellectual Rigour and Uncommon Integrity
Debt-ridden graduates claim they are seen as cash cows
Why non-fiction books need their indexes
Changes in status: Local Elections wrap up
Daniel Walker
David Raw
Jenny Barnes
Tom Bailey
Gill Travers
9 Comments
AV?
I thought all Myoral elections had to be fought using SV, wasn’t aware AV was possible. Am I wrong, or are you getting the systems mixed up?
The election was under SV
If it was under the much superior AV it is possible that Labour could have come second if a lot of the greens transferred to Labour.
Under AV voters get to rank ALL the candidates in order of preference.
Under SV voters can only rank 2 candidates (presumably their favourite and the one they least dislike out of the two candidates they think might come first or second
That’s what I thought, danke. I’m of the opinion SV should be bSVs, or bloody Stupid Voting system, it really is a poor way of voting, twice the tactical guesswork, even more voter confusion, horrible results on occasions (hello Doncaster).
`But their decision to support the Tories in government proves what we in Watford have known for many years – that you cannot trust the Liberal Democrats. Their decision will not only be their downfall but also that of the good people of our town and country who wanted and most of all needed the return of a Labour`
Spare me the patronising garbage – if the `good preople of Watford` (as it says later in the article) wanted Labour they would have returned a Labour MP – and if you add up the coalition votes they come to more than the Labour votes
No offence, guys, but surely we can do better than nit-picking a local Labour newsletter?
How about an exposée on the horrible flaws of FPTP? Or whether Lib Dems should give their whole-hearted support to the AV referendum or try to campaign further for STV?
The Supplementary Vote is a particularly stupid system. So it is worth discussing, and I will continue my efforts in the Lords from time to time, to get it changed to AV.
Tony Greaves
Tony; something we agree on completely; a good line I suspect would be to bring all voting systems into line as truely preferential if the AV referendum is passed. Good arguments include reducing voter confusion and consistency.
It also brings STV in for Europe, and forces out SV. It might also be a good way of getting STV in for local elections without making it too obvious what the objective is…
Oh, Daan? The site has a wide number of articles on a side range of issues, I’m pretty sure “why FPTP sucks” or similar has been covered several times, if it hasn’t it’s probably because LDs tend to take it as a given. And how to deal with the AV referendum is an ongoing discussion, I’m sure the eds would be happy to receive submissions on it.
In the mayoral election in Lewisham this year, the Tories were claiming “the Liberal Democrats came a poor third in the last mayoral election”. Which seemed weird, because the Liberal Democrats clearly came second in the mayoral election in Lewisham in 2006. It took me a while to work out that by “last mayoral election” they meant the one which elected Boris Johnson as Mayor of London. And they have the cheek to accuse US of “dirty tricks”.