Labour to cut short their party conference?

Manchester Town Hall ClockThe Labour party is planning to cut short their party conference if Scotland votes Yes, according to leaks to Huffington Post.

The conference is due to run in Manchester from this Sunday through to next Wednesday, but they are assuming that Parliament would be recalled on Monday if Yes wins. In that event, it seems all ministerial speeches and fringe meetings will be cancelled, “with the exception of the keynote address from Labour leader Ed Miliband next Tuesday” .  That does not leave much, and delegates who are not MPs will be left to create their own entertainment in Manchester.

“No one thought about it,” said a senior Labour frontbencher, when asked by HuffPost UK why the party leadership hadn’t anticipated the party political fallout from a Yes vote in the Scottish referendum and, in particular, the implications for the annual conference season.

Maybe Liberal Democrats should be pleased that the party had the foresight to move our conference, which was originally planned for last weekend, to October. But maybe not, because HuffPo suggests that we may have to cancel ours as well if there is urgent business going on in Westminster at the time.


* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Julian Tisi 17th Sep '14 - 4:15pm

    Yes it was a very strange Huff Post article. Amazing that no-one at Labour thought about what might happen if there was a Yes (if indeed this is all true) but I don’t see why this should affect us.

  • Left to their own entertainment? They could have a film night and a disco.

  • How can WE hold a national conference in Glasgow if it has voted to leave the UK?

  • Manchester is less than 2 hours by train from London. They’ll make it work if they have to.

    Having said that, as someone on the fence in the indyref, less Labour conference might just tip me into the Yes camp…

  • Not cancelled, but how can it be held in Glasgow, it looks ridiculous.

  • @Iain Donaldson
    “They could visit our Transport Museum and learn how despite Labour’s claims that the only way to get the Tram extended was to introduce a congestion charge, the Lib Dems in Government managed to secure the funding without such a charge.”

    That isn’t true at all. The extensions you refer to (to Ashton, East Didsbury, and the airport) were all planned before the coalition came to power, and all government funding for them was agreed by March 2010 – when we still had a Labour government. The Lib Dems had nothing to do with it whatsoever.

    The only part of the network the coalition has made any contribution to is the yet-unbuilt 0.8 mile second city crossing, which was only proposed in 2011.

    Many of the other things on your list are largely thanks to Manchester council, the university, and other local organisations. Manchester is indeed a very forward-thinking city these days – despite/because of (delete according to preference) the fact that 95 of the city’s 96 councillors are Labour.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Alex Macfie
    By-election campaigns rarely refer back to the circumstances that caused the by-election. As I have noted, it didn't in Eastbourne (or if it did, it was in the ...
  • Alex Macfie
    "An election where the choices are one party-approved candidate and an assortment of racists (if Batley & Spen is anything to go by) doesn’t really serve ...
  • Andy Boddington
    We should not contest this election or any other that occures after a murder. Otherwise that creates a danger that some people may think that murder is a way to...
  • Nonconformistradical
    I think the murders of Airey Neave and Ian Gow were very different situations from those of Jo Cox and Sir David Amess. Both earlier victims appear been clearly...
  • Steve Comer
    I think we need to distinguish between respect for an MP who was murdered and tacit support for their party. By standing down in a by-election we do the latter...