Mark Pack

Labour-Tory two-party politics is now the minority

By | Tue 10th April 2007 - 5:33 pm

Bad news for Labour and Conservative activists who don’t like those pesky liberals. Sorry folks.

I’ve been taking a look at the recently published Thrasher and Rallings projected results for the new Westminster Parliamentary boundaries.

Take all the seats where Labour and first and the Conservatives are second, or vice-versa, strip out the three-way marginals and … voila … you only have a minority of the seats in Parliament. Or to put it the other way round – the majority of Westminster constituencies are now not straight-forward Labour/Conservative contests.

Anyone fancy a bet on how long it will take the media to notice?

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • James Schneider 10th Apr '07 - 6:21pm

    What constitutes a three way marginal?
    This illustrates how on the ball Cameron has been. You need Liberal votes to win a majority in a GE.

  • Mark Pack 10th Apr '07 - 8:13pm

    I took the three-way marginal definition Thrasher and Rallings used in their book.

  • Hywel Morgan 11th Apr '07 - 8:37am

    Is this that new – I remember us bandying about some statistic pre the 1992 election that we were second in more Tory seats than Labour.

    The problem was most of them were distant seconds – most of the close seconds were Labour.

    The key difference now is that I suspect we are a lot closer in a lot more seats than at that time.

    This is the tories key problem – not only do they need to win a lot of seats – they aren’t terribly close to winning a lot of those that they do need.

  • Hywel Morgan 11th Apr '07 - 7:43pm

    Are there any comparative figures for three way marginals in 92/7.

    My gut feeling is that there would be masses more now than back then.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Chambers
    > Clearly the aircraft carriers were a pork barrel for Gordon Brown’s constituency. Doubtful. More to do with the US "pivot to Asia". The UK does not have...
  • Mark ValladaresMark Valladares
    @ Matt (Bristol), You use the word “vanguardism” as though politicians don’t have an obligation to lead, rather than merely following the loudest voice...
  • Mark Smulian
    I first worked with Michael on his three pamphlets published in the mid-1980s by Liberator and mentioned above by Geoffrey Payne. He was, obviously, an effectv...
  • Geoff Reid
    As well as being at the heart of the best Assembly/Conference coffee room conversations, Michael was for me the best compass we had over half a century. His lea...
  • Margaret Pollus
    @Tristan Ward Trans women are women - biological women. So the Equality Act 2010 needs to ensure that all womens rights, including pregnancy and maternity prote...