Met set to lose £5m from collapse of Icelandic bank

London’s Metropolitan Policy Authority had £30m deposited with Landsbanki, the Icelandic bank which collapsed in late 2008. Combing through some of the latest financial information from the MPA, it’s clear that the MPA is now expecting (at best) to get 83% of that back, leaving the police with a £5.1m loss.

Ouch. Though not so ouch as to have stopped the £2m a year spent on chauffeur-driven cars for senior Met officers who don’t have a security need for one.

(To put these numbers in some context: the annual cost of a police constable is c.£60,000.)

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in London.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Met set to lose £5m from collapse of Icelandic bank? That’s a drop in the ocean compared to to cuts that are about to happen, the police could , or so I heard on the BBC today, lose up to 28 thousand personnel.
    Now that puts things into context.

  • Ian Sanderson 30th Jun '10 - 10:31am

    I presume we’re talking about the Metropolitan PolicE Authority.
    Again, as with the Icelandic bank investments by local authorities, it shows a preponderance of herd mentality over common sense. It is astonishing that bodies that, in some cases, actually have larger populations than Iceland, came to believe that Icelandic banks had some magic that would allow them to offer market leading interest rates on a sustainable basis.
    There are two common reasons for offering top rates on investment: one is trying to build a market share and is prepared tp offer and loss-making return for a limited time; the second is that the investment is risky and the higher return is used to tempt people in.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Steve Trevethan
    Might the root problems of yesterday’s childish and selfish behaviours be found in the extremely unsuited design of the House of Commons, the lout behaviour o...
  • Jeff
    expats 21st Feb '24 - 8:24am: I looked at the ‘trading giants’ listed… This makes my point perfectly. As with other Brexit benefits, the...
  • Neil Fawcett
    @Paul Barker - she clearly didn't hide them very well. Another member spotted that she had made some abhorrent posts on social media and put in a complaint. As ...
  • Nick Baird
    Imperfect as it is, our democracy is the sum of its parts, and one of those parts is Opposition Day debates. The second largest party gets 17 of those per parl...
  • Nigel Jones
    So good to have Layla representing us in Foreign Policy, especially on this issue. A pity she did not have time to say more, especially to put things in perspec...