Two weeks ago – at the height of the political storm surrounding RBS’s Sir Fred Goodwin’s £693,000 £703,000 a year pension pay-out – LDV asked our readers: How do you think the issue of Sir Fred Goodwin’s RBS pension should be resolved?
Here’s what you said:
>> 15% (45 votes): The government should legislate to claw back a large part of Sir Fred’s pension
>> 29% (89): The government should instruct that Sir Fred be paid a minimum amount, and he should sue if he wants his full entitlement.
>> 52% (160): The government should abide by the agreement entered into between Sir Fred and RBS and sanctioned by its own business minister
>> 4% (12): Don’t know / Other
Total Votes: 306. Poll ran: 2nd-16th March 2009
So a clear majority of readers reckoned Sir Fred should keep his pension, though Hywel’s comment probably summed up the general mood:
“Do you think Sir Fred is entitled to his £650,000 a year RBS pension?”
Entitled yes, deserves no.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Reform adopt the Trump agenda on elections
What would have happened if St Pancras station had been closed?
Rhodri Morgan statue unveiled in Cardiff
The Wealth Tax is a Progressive Fallacy
Why don't people use trains more?
Paul Walter
Peter Martin
David Raw
Roland
One Comment
“>> 52% (160): The government should abide by the agreement entered into between Sir Fred and RBS and sanctioned by its own business minister”
This answer makes a number of assertions which, according to documents released today, aren’t true.
All this poll demonstrates is the danger of how phrasing the question can determine the outcome.