LDVideo: Chris Davies MEP – MEPs’ kindness will kill the fishing industry

Speaking at a plenary session of the European Parliament yesterday, Chris Davies, European Parliament member for the North West, urged his fellow MEPs to look beyond the short term to vote to restore fish stocks:

But his frustration (and passion for this subject) was clear later, after a five-vote margin saw the amendment passed:

* Nick Thornsby is a day editor at Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in YouTube.


  • Paul McKeown 13th Sep '12 - 11:20am

    Well said, Chris Davies. But is anyone listening?

  • Well done Chris Davies. A passionate intervention on a crucial issues. However, its a disgrace to see the chamber almost empty.

  • It seems to be this vote:
    I can’t find the text of the amendment in the short time I have, but the amendment is presumably against fish stock replenishment and pro-overfishing, as Chris (and most ALDE MEPs) voted against it, but it passed by 5 votes.
    Most UK Tories voted for this amendment, as Chris has tweeted.
    Interesting that the majority on this vote was formed by ECR, EPP and GUE/NGL: the right voting with the far left!
    @Paul McKeown: Probably not. Is anyone reporting it? Unlikely. Will the Lib Dem party HQ let us campaign on this or any other stuff that MEPs have done in the next European Parliamentary election? Sadly I doubt it, even though this is the only way we are going to win any seats.

  • ” its a disgrace to see the chamber almost empty.”
    Yet so many MEPs (754) out of 808) voted on the amendment, with the majority voting on political group lines – I know we complain about Westminster MP’s behaving like sheep, but I wonder whether the majority of MEP’s actually knew what they were voting for/against …

  • Chris Davies is fighting the good fight on this vitally important issue. Researchers have been warning for years that Europe’s fishing fleets take far more fish from the sea than is sustainable. Scientific advice is routinely ignored when limits on catches are set.Changing the Common Fisheries Policy that governs EU catches has been repeatedly scuppered by political infighting.

    Chris can only continue his John the Baptist like exhoratations to repent and see the light – in the hope that fellow MEPs will come to recognise the need for urgent measures to prevent the extinction of many of our current fish species.

  • Alex Macfie 13th Sep '12 - 2:22pm

    @Roland: Party discipline in general is actually much weaker in the European Parliament than in the UK Parliament. If this were a Westminster division, it would most likely have been 100% of MPs voting along party lines. By UK Parliamentary standards, practically all MEPs are party rebels.

  • Nigel Quinton 14th Sep '12 - 12:36pm

    Well done Chris – yet again!

    So why was there no coverage of this on the today programme this morning when they actually had an item on fish stocks – featuring a representative from nef (new economics foundation) whose recommendations were grossly distorted by the presenter, and a representative of the fishing industry churning out the usual crap lines as he is paid to do?

    And why is Chris not featured centre stage on the national party website as one of the most passionate advocates of our party, and of evidence based policy that we have?

  • Chris,

    have you reviewed the reseach carried out by the New Economic Foundation No catch investment.

    Key Findings:

    – Most overfished stocks could be fully restored within five years, with a few needing four more years
    Investing £9.16 billion in restoring fish stocks would generate £4.43 billion profit by 2023

    – After stocks are restored the total value of landings would almost triple, generating £14.62 billion in revenue each year

    – The Return on Investment (ROI) of restoring fish stocks is 148% by 2023

    – By 2052 the returns are £14 for every £1 invested

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael 1 24th Feb - 10:58pm
    I am an Unionist albeit one that lives in England. But I'd suggest several things to preserve the union. 1. We and the other unionist...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 24th Feb - 10:12pm
    @TCO Council tenants are not allowed to sublet their premises. And no, many Councils do not have suitable smaller accomodation to offer for tenants to...
  • User AvatarMichael 1 24th Feb - 10:10pm
    My understanding is that councils can now borrow more for their own commercial undertakings and some (many ?) are doing that to fund their own...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 24th Feb - 8:18pm
    Interesting points, Joe, but there's also a world outside London, and I do wish TCO would look outside his world too. Look up and consider...
  • User AvatarAlexandrine Kantor 24th Feb - 7:30pm
    To Miranda Pinch, there is zero excuses for terrorism. It is just wrong. And I am not supportive from the far right government of Israel....
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 24th Feb - 7:24pm
    David Raw, Using robust evidence and considering the impact of unintended consequences in formulating policy is indeed good advice. The under-occupancy charge was poorly conceived...