Leadership update: How they count the votes

The party is catering for all the process geeks amongst its membership well this afternoon with an explanation of exactly how the votes are being counted. The result is expected in the next hour:

All of the ballot papers have been returned directly to Electoral Reform Services (the commercial arm of the Electoral Reform Society) who are running the election for us.

Ahead of the count, the ERS opened all of the returned envelopes, and put the votes into batches of 100 ready for counting.

The count is conducted by ERS staff as is supervised by a small team from party HQ (Tim Gordon our CEO, Darren Briddock from the party’s compliance team and Austin Rathe form the membership team) along with the agents and additional observers from each of the two campaigns. The count is a sterile environment, so representatives from both campaigns will have to hand in their mobile phones before entering the count area – hence why you won’t hear anything during the count!

The count has commenced with all the batches of 100 being combined together and then counted into two piles, according to which candidate has the first preference for each vote. At this stage doubtful or unclear ballots will be separated and adjudicated on by the returning officer, just as they in a normal political election. The campaign team’s observers can point out and challenge ballots, but the returning officer’s decision is final.

With only two candidates there will of course be a result after one round of voting (unless there is a tie, in which case we will draw lots). Once the count is finished the two agents will be informed of the result, and they wil in turn inform their candidates. The party will announce the result very shortly afterwards – we expect this to be at around 5pm.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Richard Underhill 17th Jul '15 - 10:51am

    No comments.
    We trust the Electoral Reform Services (the commercial arm of the Electoral Reform Society)

  • I was amused to see that my ballot paper sternly admonished me NOT to put a cross by one name but to number the candidates in order of preference…like 1, 2 and er, that’s it. Makes a huge difference in a two-candidate contest.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David
    With great respect, i remember when Labour clobbered the country for tax in the 1970s. The aim of a wealth tax is an honourable one but it reeks of socialism an...
  • Jana
    “The challenge is not simply funding. It is that vocational education is still widely regarded as a second-choice option, while university remains the default...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Theakes @ Nonconformistradical You, too, are both missing the point. If the protesters were possibly guilty of grievous bodily harm, or whatever, then this...
  • Jana
    “The economy works beautifully for those at the top and barely at all for everyone else” You know this is a complete exaggeration. The vast majority of o...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Chloe, "Palastine (sic) is one of those – as a labour MP put it – middle class hobby horse subject. " I'd be probably be described as "Mi...