Lembit wins MPs’ expenses appeal, is now owed £40

Last week it was Lib Dem MP Jeremy Browne has won his appeal against repaying £18,000 of expenses. Now fellow Lib Dem Lembit Opik has also had his appeal against repaying hundreds of pounds in parliamentary expenses allowed by Sir Paul Kennedy, the judge brought in to arbitrate on disputed claims. The BBC reports:

Montgomeryshire MP Lembit Opik was ordered to pay back £900 he claimed for a mobile phone bill. Sir Thomas Legg, the retired civil servant auditing MPs’ expenses, said the Liberal Democrat MP should not have been able to claim for the phone bill. But Mr Opik won an appeal against the ruling.

Intriguingly, this leaves the taxpayer in debt to Lembit:

The MP, one of almost 80 MPs to challenge Sir Thomas, has actually repaid £195 in total, so is now technically owed £40 by the Commons authorities.

Now there’s an ethical dilemma for an MP just months away from seeking re-election.

Menawhile, here’s a brief clip of Lib Dem MP Norman Baker talking about the publication of Sir Thomas’s report.

(Hat-tip: PoliticsHome).

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • My quick calculation is that the combined total paid back by Lib Dem MPs is less than that paid back by Labour Mp Barbara Follett.

  • Anthony Aloysius St 5th Feb '10 - 1:00am

    I suspect that the more rulings against MPs that are overturned on appeal, the more people will conclude that the political establishment in general still doesn’t “get it”.

    I wish someone would explain – for example – why taxpayers should contribute towards two sets of mortgage payments, in respect of both of Jeremy Browne’s homes – one for the mortgage on his London home, and the other for a second mortgage to pay for the deposit on his Taunton home.

    I can see a kind of argument in favour of one extra taxpayer-funded home – though Nick Clegg has made so much noise about no Lib Dem MP making a capital gain from even _one_ house purchase that I hope Jeremy is committed to paying back his profits on _both_ properties.

    But two taxpayer-funded homes? Do ordinary people expect their employers to buy a house for them? How can anyone defend it?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Peter
    @Jenny - The claim that global warming will lead to extreme weather is due entirely to indications from the failed climate models. Now the internet and mainstr...
  • Peter Martin
    ' “......the best state of human nature” involves nobody being poor, nobody having the desire to be richer and nobody fearing that they could be thrust...
  • john oundle
    The National sales in 2015 totaled 20,000 copies which by 2017 had collapsed to less than 10,000 in 2017. Outsold by every Scottish regional daily with the exc...
  • Paul Barker
    On The Polls, individual Polls are worse than useless. Looking at an average of recent Polls, We are around 9% & The Greens around 6%. Looking at Local B...
  • Frank W
    Not having children will do much more to save the planet than not eating meat or driving a car, so all tax and benefit incentives for having kids (in a year's t...