Stephen Tall

Lib Dem MP urges charity fines for mobile phone menace MPs

By | Tue 11th November 2008 - 10:45 am

Greg Mulholland, Lib Dem MP for Leeds North West, has urged House of Commons Speaker Michael Martin to introduce fines whenever an MP’s phone rings in the chamber. His proposal came after Culture Secretary Andy Burnham was repeatedly interrupted by Tory MP John Whittingdale’s Blackberry (he was, apparently, unaware how to switch it off).

BBC.co.uk takes up the story:

Calling a point of order minutes later, Mr Mulholland, a former Leeds city councillor raised the subject of the interruption. He said: “Whilst accepting that we’re all fallible in terms of the potential to leave our mobile phones on, may I recommend to the House a scheme in Leeds City Council whereby the Lord Mayor of Leeds fines a member of council who has his or her phone ring?”

He added: “And may I suggest that the Speaker considers a suitable charity and introduces a similar scheme in this House?” To laughter in the Commons chamber, the Speaker responded: “I’ve no powers to fine honourable gentlemen or ladies for that matter”. …

Speaking to the BBC, Mr Mulholland accepted that the Speaker clearly cannot budge on the matter, but said “I was talking about an informal protocol, not a serious thing”. He added: “If I get caught out I will pay money to a charity – and if the speaker doesn’t want to nominate one, I will find someone who will. It seems a particularly good natured way of dealing with this.”

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Hywel Morgan 11th Nov '08 - 5:30pm

    “the Speaker responded: “I’ve no powers to fine honourable gentlemen or ladies for that matter”

    Doesn’t the house have powers to imprison for breach of its privileges? In which case its not a great leap for the speaker to have powers to fine members.

  • Hywel Morgan 27th Nov '08 - 11:11pm

    It would appear not. The House last imposed a fine in 1666. I think it’s probably wise not to treat the actions of the House in the mid 1600s as having precedent value….

    Though the power of imprisonment has been used more recently.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • John McHugo
    Anne-Marie - thank you for focussing our minds on this. Our parliamentarians must not allow this issue to slip out of the "urgent" category. Two points. Fir...
  • Mick Taylor
    The last thing we need at the moment is a leadership election. They're usually divisive and what we need is a united approach to holding this government to acco...
  • Mick Taylor
    Thanks for the mainly positive comments. @DavidLeGrice. I think you missed the point. The whole thurst of my argument is that it's not solely down to the leade...
  • Meral Hussein-Ece
    An excellent and timely article, reminding us what is at stake. If the Liberal Democrats truly support a two state solution (over 70% do) and lasting peace, we ...
  • Jana
    Fully agree. I now await an article from Liberal Friends of Israel suggesting that opposition to building this settlement, or against seizing Palestinian lan...