Part of the recent Paul Dacre attack on Justice Eady (who ruled against the News of the World in the Max Mosley case) was that he was unaccountable for his actions and basically a one-man band introducing a privacy law on his own. He was supported in this attack by The Sun’s managaing editor, Graham Dudman, who said, “The issue here is that Justice Eady is unelected and unaccountable. Parliament has not made these decisions, one man has”.
But Liberal Democrat peer Lord Lester has hit back today, pointing out that when the law on which Eady’s rulings are based was passed through Parliament, this very issue was actually debated – and Parliament passed up on the opportunity to give the media a broad exemption: “This issue was fully debated when the human rights bill was before parliament. Some sections of the media lobbied for a complete immunity from article 8 of the European human rights convention, which guarantees the right of respect for personal privacy. Instead, the government and parliament included section 12, emphasising the paramount importance of free expression.”
Far from Eady’s actions being that of one unaccountable man, they are the result of what Parliament decided. Isn’t that how democracy and a legal system are meant to work together?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
After Dark podcast on the R101 airship disaster
After the murder of Ann Widdecombe, we must all be more careful of the language we use in political life
Burnham starts with the low-hanging fruit
Political history points against early general elections
Working 9 to 5
Jana
Alex Macfie
Jenny Barnes
Rupinder Singh
Chris Cory
2 Comments
Dacre is asking for trouble. I sent him a polite yet dismissive letter on my blog this morning, as the concept of privacy is clearly lost on him.
http://www.lettersfromatory.com
Do you mean I can’t rely that everything Paul Dacre says is correct?
My faith in the whole of humanity is destroyed 🙂