Mark Pack

How do the party’s central finances look in the run-up to the general election?

By | Fri 19th February 2010 - 10:20 am

With the party’s spring federal conference just round the corner, the latest report from the party’s Federal Finance and Administration Committee (FFAC) is out, which gives the chance to compare the party’s finances now with five years ago.

The good news bit

The federal party’s core activities are generating significantly higher income.

General fund surplus after income generation costs:

2004 £2,642,253
2009 £3,214,500

That 22% increase is impressive, particularly given the recession in 2009 and its impact on fundraising.

The no news bit

The federal party’s debts have not changed much over the last five years, with only a very small rise in the accumulated deficit on the general fund:

2004 £154,000
2009 £158,000

The please donate bit

However, the party’s real challenge is to fund an intense level of campaigning through a five year, rather than a four year, Parliament. With many donations, particularly the larger ones, made towards ‘the next general election’, a five year Parliament runs up extra costs but does not bring in extra income in the same way.

As a result, the accumulated campaign fund surplus going in to the general election year is much lower this time round:

2004 £780,000
2009 c.£250,000

However, the party is very bullish about its financial prospects this year, with the FFAC report saying that for the Campaign Fund in 2010, “Total income is budgeted to be around £4m, which is substantially higher than in any previous general election year”.
Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in General Election.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Davies
    They might well have different interests. Professional investers invest in what they believe to be the best interests of the pensioners who entrusted them with ...
  • William Wallace
    It's a sign of how far some right-wing politicians have drifted that Liz Truss calls the Times a 'left-wing' paper!...
  • Slamdac
    Following from Craig's comments, sadly I don't think Liberal/Progressive parties and organisations can be trusted to police free speech. To often they abuse wh...
  • John Marriott
    Some interesting comments. Glad I contacted LDV* again. And FINALLY …. to borrow a phrase that George W Bush used after the 2017 inauguration, there’s “so...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might government and professional investors have different purposes? Might one invest for the general good of citizens and their children and the other inves...