Liberal Democrats block David Cameron’s plans to erode workers’ rights

Another glimpse into what a Tory Britain would look like comes in today’s Independent which reports that the Liberal Democrats in the shape of Business Secretary Vince Cable have fended off an attempt by the Prime Minister to erode the rights of employees. Adrian Beecroft, a venture capitalist who has donated almost £600,000 to the Conservative Party, produced a report last year which has so far not been published, which is believed to include proposals to allow employers to fire unproductive workers and cut entitlement to maternity leave.

The Tories, says the Independent, from David Cameron down, wanted to implement this report in full, but the Liberal Democrats put a stop to it:

Vince Cable, the Business Secretary, whose department is responsible for employment law, said he did not want to bring in a “hire and fire culture”. Unlike Mr Beecroft, he detected little demand for such rules.

After a row in the Coalition, a compromise was reached in which Mr Cable agreed to consider “no-fault dismissal” for firms employing fewer than 10 people. But he said he has no intention of bringing it in. A Liberal Democrat source said: “It’s in the long, long grass.”

You can read the article in full here.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • Isn’t Beecroft a massive donor to the Tory Party? Is it not scandalous that a massive donor should write policy, even if Cable rejected it?

    Shouldn’t the lib dems be doing everything they can to draw attention to this potential cash for policy scandal, and how they averted it?

  • Geoffrey Payne 28th Mar '12 - 12:16pm

    Now this is precisely why we need the Lib Dems in government. If only this happened more often. However it did look like these policies would get through, or a watered down version of them. But it is NOT in the Coalition agreement and there is no reason why the Lib Dems should agree to this.

  • It’s no wonder our competitiveness has dropped when employers aren’t allowed to dismiss “unproductive workers.” With so many people dying to get into work, it’s a shame that Cable is defending lazy workers and blocking enthusiastic would-be employees from entering the workplace.

  • I don’t expect those here with an orange shade to be too happy about this.

  • The question is whether our Vince is also a counterbalance to other members of the Coalition Government.?

  • Malcolm Todd 29th Mar '12 - 3:42pm

    @tom jones — not sure whether you’re being serious, but if you are you’re resting on a series of unspoken assumptions:
    that employers know whether you’re an unproductive worker;
    that employers will always be honest (and not say, for example, “I sacked her because she was unproductive — it was nothing to do with her being pregnant and/or refusing my sexual advances”);
    that an unproductive worker is the same thing as a “lazy worker”.

    It is, of course, perfectly possible to sack a worker who is incompetent or lazy. What (some) employers object to is being asked to prove that that was the reason and that it was a reasonable conclusion to reach.

  • Richard Swales 2nd Apr '12 - 1:43pm

    There are two things I want to say. The first most will agree with and the second not.

    First, paid maternity leave is something that we as a society want and support. The costs of it should fall on society as a whole (in other words shared between all taxpayers, companies, groups of workers both male and female), it should not be paid for directly by whichever company (or group of workers) is unfortunate (or honest, or some would say daft) enough to employ/include too many women of the wrong age and family circumstances. Otherwise we can expect discrimination.

    Second, if there exists a right to be employed by someone who doesn’t want you, then I hereby exercise my right to be employed by Malcolm Todd. See you tomorrow at 9 o’clock.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarManfarang 28th Jan - 2:35am
    How much is the Labour Party going to Red Book shaped is what will determine relations between the Liberal Democrats and Labour.
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 28th Jan - 1:23am
    We honour Holocaust Memorial Day and as Liberal Democrats this is the only real aspect of today that should fire us up!
  • User AvatarHywel 27th Jan - 11:49pm
    I wonder what Nick's record of success in political campaigns looks like. It's a fair question to ask of someone setting out a political strategy.
  • User AvatarRuth Bright 27th Jan - 11:26pm
    Glenn - quite. Converting non-voters is a more likely strategy. Nick Tyrone has achieved his goal of getting some attention a bit like when Germaine...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 27th Jan - 11:12pm
    Katharine Pindar 27th Jan '20 - 7:53pm "John Roffey. Thanks, John, but I am curbing my international instincts here to concentrate on the needs of...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 27th Jan - 11:03pm
    @ Matthew Huntbach, @ Katharine "Thanks to the cosy agreement between the Conservatives and Labour, these people had no MPs to properly represent them." "These...