LIbLink: Cathy Bakewell: In the last days of the Housing Bill, peers will fight for equality

Liberal Democrat peer Cathy Bakewell has written an article for Politics Home in which she outlines the work that Lib Dem peers are doing to try to make the Government’s Housing Bill less bad.

Lib Dems have been leading the charge on many aspects of the fight, and three of the five remaining obstacles to the legislation passing are Lib Dem amendments. These are measures to make new homes more flood resilient and low carbon, and to give communities a Neighbourhood Right of Appeal when a council deviates from their local plan.

These things have become sticking points for us, because as we know from our local activism it’s not just the quantity of housing that desperately needs attention, but also the quality.

It’s no good ploughing ahead and building thousands of homes which make future homeowners liable to flooding and responsible for higher energy bills, when simple and cost effective changes could be made at the building stage to protect them. We need more homes, but they must be sustainable.

As well as the impact on individuals, it’s the impact on the environment that matters. If we are serious about making the Paris Agreement a reality and tackling climate change, then we absolutely have to reduce the carbon emissions from homes, which are huge contributors.

There is wide support for our amendments from across the parties and the industry, and that’s why the Government has still failed to get its way in removing them from the bill.

It costs just £3,000 per home to make them low carbon, and probably even less, as costs are rapidly coming down. Compared to the cost of building a new home this pales into insignificance and yet results in a life time of lower bills for homeowners. The cost is three times higher to install solar panels on an existing home than include them in the original build, so it makes obvious sense.

It’s also ludicrous that the Government is failing to ensure new homes are built with sufficient flood protections. We are fighting for developers to use sustainable drainage systems to limit the flood risk, something which would make a big difference.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJames Baillie 3rd Jun - 11:19am
    Agreed fully with this - though we should equally be extending the franchise to non-citizen residents of the UK as well. For democracy to work,...
  • User AvatarJulian Ingram 3rd Jun - 11:03am
    A rebrand or brand refresh comes after you have defined what the brand wants to communicate in terms of values. Not before. What is urgent...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 3rd Jun - 10:29am
    @ Joe Bourke There's a lot of evidence about LLG's declining health in the years after the 'Flu epidemic, Joe. He was seriously ill in...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 3rd Jun - 9:57am
    @Peter Martin And, while you’re at it, there’s no ‘e’ on ‘Kampf’ either, unless you mean the plural, in which case it also requires an...
  • User AvatarChris Cory 3rd Jun - 9:49am
    Why is the media not showing recordings of Johnson saying "no border in the Irish Sea", on a loop, until the whole country sees him...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 3rd Jun - 9:43am
    You could have said that with a bit more grace, Peter. Surely you don't want to become regarded as the Labour equivalent of the Blustering...