LibLink: Christine Jardine: Campbell-Bannerman, School Meals Pioneer

There has been some controversy about Nick Clegg’s sudden announcement last September that schoolchildren would get a hot meal every day at school for the first 3 years. Some within the Party feel that resources could be better spent. Others argue that it does make a difference, having a direct effect on children’s learning ability.

Clegg though, is not the first liberal to be associated with such a policy, as former Special Adviser Christine Jardine wrote in the Scotsman this week:

Exactly a century ago, the last Liberal government to win a majority at Westminster made their policy compulsory to ensure councils across the country offered free school meals to all children.

Scots prime minister Henry Campbell-Bannerman had included the measure in his party’s programme of reforms in 1906, but councils resisted its implementation. Sound familiar?

Fast-forward 100 years and here we are again. Liberals at Westminster implement a policy to ensure infant classes have a hot meal during the school day and an SNP administration at Holyrood refuses to follow suit, until forced to bow to public pressure and provide free meals for primaries 1 to 3.

Christine argues that Campbell-Bannerman is not honoured sufficiently in his home city of Glasgow, having become a forgotten Prime Minister:

I first became intrigued by the city’s apparent ambivalence about one of its most successful sons when my daughter started secondary school. There, in the building at Anniesland Cross, was the bust of a politician whose achievements had played such a big part in influencing my own political ideology. In a city which rightly trumpets its contribution to the birth and development of this country’s Labour movement, there seemed little else of significance to mark the contribution to the shape of modern Britain of a man some have dubbed the first truly radical politician of the 20th century.

I’ve no doubt there are other memorials, perhaps at the University of Glasgow, maybe somewhere in the City Chambers. But surely it is time, more than a century after his death, that the city of his birth did something on a larger scale to mark Campbell-Bannerman’s achievements.

Perhaps when the Liberal Democrats return to Glasgow for their federal conference this year, the city fathers should take the opportunity to suggest some sort of joint celebration of his life and political contribution. Glasgow could perhaps launch some wider project to establish a permanent new landmark or memorial to all its citizens who have made a major political contribution to shaping modern Britain.

You can read the whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Perhaps when the Liberal Democrats return to Glasgow for their federal conference this year, the city fathers should take the opportunity to suggest some sort of joint celebration of his life and political contribution

    How about honouring Campbell-Bannerman by announcing the end of The Coalition ?
    I am sure he would have enjoyed the prospect of being the starting point for an all-out attack on the Conservatives.

  • For those who have nocluewho he was –

    Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, Liberal Leader 1905 to 1908. Born 1836, Kelvinside House, Glasgow

    Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman was the first man to be given official use of the title ‘Prime Minister’. Known as CB, he was a firm believer in free trade, Irish Home Rule and the improvement of social conditions.

    Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman was the son of the Lord Provost of Glasgow, and was educated at Glasgow High School and at Glasgow and Cambridge universities.

    In 1868 he was elected the Liberal MP for Stirling Burghs. William Ewart Gladstone appointed him Financial Secretary at the War Office, and then Secretary of State for War in his next 2 governments. He held the position again under Lord Rosebery. Later, he became the Liberal leader, and was seen as ‘a safe pair of hands’.

    The Liberals split over the Boer War, with David Lloyd George joining Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman in condemning the campaign. He himself caused a public uproar by refusing to take back his remarks about Kitchener’s “methods of barbarism” being used to win the war.

    Following Arthur James Balfour’s resignation in 1905, Edward VII invited Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, as leader of the next largest party, to form a government. He accepted the King’s offer.

    His government became known for being strong and efficient, and he skilfully ensured that it embraced all wings of the Liberal party.

    Possibly his best quote –
    “Personally I am an immense believer in bed, in constantly keeping horizontal: the heart and everything else goes slower, and the whole system is refreshed.”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Mark Frankel
    This strikes me as a bit overblown. The American civil war killed 600,000. What will be the death toll under a new Trump presidency?...
  • Martin Gray
    Centrist governments support the rules of international order. Sadly , when it comes to the Palestine those rules , those values , have all but been abandoned...
  • Peter Hirst
    For all its faults, America remains a democracy and we must retain our links. Brexit allows us to show flexibility in our strategic relations. We must now allow...
  • David Raw
    As a long time student of political history who first joined (and was employed by) the Liberal Party way back in 1962, I've come to believe that the basic quali...
  • Peter Hirst
    Putting country before party seems to me to be quite apposite in the context of the last decade. The Party system is a weakness of our present structures. It is...