LibLink: David Steel: Tim Farron is a man of conviction and a risk taker – that’s why he got my vote

David Steel has written in the Guardian about why he backed Tim Farron and what he thinks he’ll bring to the party:

That level of deep commitment which Farron obviously has, combined with his organisational skills and northern public persona, has all the ingredients of a successful leadership. I speak as one who sat in a gloomy Commons party of six after the 1970 election debacle, three of us clinging to majorities under 1000. It took time, but we turned that round, and went on both to increase our numbers and form the significant Alliance with the SDP and eventually the new united party, which at elections under Paddy Ashdown, Charles Kennedy and Clegg reached new heights of public support. The same can happen again.

A colleague said to me during this contest: “But isn’t Farron a bit risky?” I responded that that may be so, but what the party needs at this time is a risk-taker, not afraid to revisit more traditional Liberal policies – on Trident, on Europe, on industrial democracy, on land value taxation, on the pursuit of a more just society, and on the need for a federal constitution including a new upper house.

It will be a long and at times painful journey, but with Tim Farron inspiring and leading it I see grounds for real hope and optimism.

 You can read the whole article here. 

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Richard Underhill 18th Jul '15 - 8:02pm

    When Paddy Ashdown was elected leader Judy Steel wrote a full page advice to Jane Ashdown, commenting. for instance, on photographers.
    Will that happen again? or will someone else do it?

  • Iain Brodie Browne 19th Jul '15 - 9:42am

    Tim has spoken out on Trident and Europe I hope he will take David Steel’s advice and add Industrial Democracy,
    profit sharing and employee ownership to his list. These were the signature policies of the Grimond revival. We desperately need these radical policies updating to make them fresh and relevant to C 21st

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User Avatarexpats 20th Jan - 10:43am
    It seems that 'Stalinism' is, more often than not, used indiscriminately by those who fail to consider what it actually was. I don't remember such...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 20th Jan - 10:27am
    Innocent bystander, this is a short discussion of globalisation https://www.thepeoplesnewsonline.co.uk/single-post/2019/01/27/georgism-offers-a-possible-alternative-to-solve-the-problems-caused-by-globalisation/ Globalisation requires international institutions to facilitate trade. There is an urgent need for a global...
  • User Avatarexpats 20th Jan - 10:04am
    Stephen Howse 20th Jan '20 - 9:55am.................We need to wait and see who Labour choose as the next leader. If it’s Starmer, Nandy, Phillips or...
  • User AvatarStephen Howse 20th Jan - 9:55am
    Expats - the point is that Corbyn was utterly toxic. The personal approval ratings don't lie and nor do Labour's election results since he took...
  • User Avatarn hunter 20th Jan - 9:47am
    The campaign to remove the 99p,or any other amount should go national. The Brexit economist Mitford seems to think that all we need is service...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 20th Jan - 9:44am
    I normally find your comments very interesting, David, but sorry, I'm afraid I find your use of the word 'Stalinism' way over the top with...