NewsHound

LibLink … James Graham: Lib-Con pact, or just a Marr moment?

By | Thu 26th November 2009 - 9:27 am

Rather belatedly* The Voice is delighted to highlight an article by Lib Dem blogger James Graham over at The Guardian’s Comment Is Free site, the subtitle of which is a neat, Tweet paraphrase of his argument: ‘The idea that the Lib Dems want to jump into bed with Cameron is a fantasy. But multiparty politics is likely to be the new norm’. But as ever with James the article is well worth reading in full. Here’s an excerpt:

There is no enthusiasm within the party for co-operation with the Conservative party, but working with Labour is almost as unenticing a prospect. To be seen propping up a government which has just lost the election after 13 years of office would cost the Lib Dems almost all their political capital. …

This dilemma is likely to stay with us, whether we change the electoral system or not. Back in 1951, 97% of voters supported one of the big two parties on an 87% turnout. In 2005 those figures were 68% and 61% respectively. In Canada, which also uses first past the post, hung parliaments are now the norm and the SNP’s stated electoral strategy is to end up with the same linchpin role that Bloc Québécois has there. Even the Greens have a shot at making a breakthrough in 2010. This is a trend which has been speeding up in recent years: multiparty politics is here to stay.

You can read James’s article in full here.

* In fairness to The Voice it took James himself 24 hours to upload it to his blog, whence we were alerted to the article’s existence.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • Hugh 26th Nov '09 - 1:53pm

    James is right about the long-term trend, but a Tory majority is more likely this time. Only voting Labour in (non-Lib Dem held) seats Tory target seats which have current majorities of more than 10% will prevent this, ie seats No. 90+ on the Tory target list.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • PM
    @ Russell, So you are saying the Windrush and other Caribbean migrants, most migrants from counties like Nigeria, India etc have been a drain on the economy....
  • Denis Mollison
    I was at the announcement (in Wadebridge I think) of the result in April 1966 when John Pardoe won it back from the Conservatives! Good to see this repeated at ...
  • Mick Taylor
    The really shocking thing about the mid-term elections is that less than half of those able to vote did so. This whole blue tsunami happened on a turnout of jus...
  • David Evans
    So the leader who chose to cosy up to the Conservatives for five years even though the impact on our party was clear from 6 months in and things just kept on ge...
  • Tristan Ward
    @Jana That sounds very much like moving to the right" No: it is occupying space that is liberal and has always been liberal, but which has been partly occ...