NewsHound

LibLink … James Graham: Lib-Con pact, or just a Marr moment?

By | Thu 26th November 2009 - 9:27 am

Rather belatedly* The Voice is delighted to highlight an article by Lib Dem blogger James Graham over at The Guardian’s Comment Is Free site, the subtitle of which is a neat, Tweet paraphrase of his argument: ‘The idea that the Lib Dems want to jump into bed with Cameron is a fantasy. But multiparty politics is likely to be the new norm’. But as ever with James the article is well worth reading in full. Here’s an excerpt:

There is no enthusiasm within the party for co-operation with the Conservative party, but working with Labour is almost as unenticing a prospect. To be seen propping up a government which has just lost the election after 13 years of office would cost the Lib Dems almost all their political capital. …

This dilemma is likely to stay with us, whether we change the electoral system or not. Back in 1951, 97% of voters supported one of the big two parties on an 87% turnout. In 2005 those figures were 68% and 61% respectively. In Canada, which also uses first past the post, hung parliaments are now the norm and the SNP’s stated electoral strategy is to end up with the same linchpin role that Bloc Québécois has there. Even the Greens have a shot at making a breakthrough in 2010. This is a trend which has been speeding up in recent years: multiparty politics is here to stay.

You can read James’s article in full here.

* In fairness to The Voice it took James himself 24 hours to upload it to his blog, whence we were alerted to the article’s existence.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • Hugh 26th Nov '09 - 1:53pm

    James is right about the long-term trend, but a Tory majority is more likely this time. Only voting Labour in (non-Lib Dem held) seats Tory target seats which have current majorities of more than 10% will prevent this, ie seats No. 90+ on the Tory target list.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter Watson
    @Richard "I suspect that saying, for example, that we would add four pence to price of a litre of petrol to fund the lifting of the “education tax” would be...
  • Steve Comer
    David Allen has already expressed a lot of comments I would wholheartedly agree with. The debates on philospohy have been interesting, but the original post ta...
  • Tristan Ward
    @ David Raw I am indeed not familiar with Elisabete Mendes Silva's work, but I have gone back to my copy of On Liberty, where, in Chapter 5, Mill and Taylor ...
  • Mick Taylor
    @TristanWard. Anarchism is the polar opposite of communism. Communism believes that the state should do almost everything, whilst anarchism rejects the state in...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Let's speak up, and demand to be heard. I don't fear what we will say, just the public not hearing from us. Newsnight on BBC 1 last night was an example of what...