LibLink: Susan Kramer warns about the economic dangers of a reckless exit from the EU

In a letter published in the Financial Times, our economic spokesperson, Baroness Susan Kramer argues that it would be “economic vandalism” for the government to fail to financial services sector during the Brexit process:

The financial services industry generates over £65bn in taxes each year, over one-tenth of total government revenue. The loss of full access to the single market in financial services would not just hurt those in the banking industry. It would mean schools, hospitals and services across the country going without funding. We all want to rebalance our economy to be less reliant on financial services, but failing to support this vital sector during Brexit would be an act of economic vandalism.

The prime minister should think very carefully before sacrificing the City on the altar of a hard Brexit.

You can read the full letter here.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

3 Comments

  • John Peters 7th Oct '16 - 11:29am

    Does the Lib Dem economics spokesperson believe we will lose £65 billion in taxes per year when we leave the single market?

    If so I suggest you start looking for an economic spokesperson who has a better grasp of economics.

  • George Crozier 9th Oct '16 - 11:03pm

    John Peters – come on, its obvious that Susan Kramer is making a point about the extent to which the taxes paid by financial services sector fund our public services. A very valid point. We can’t know the extent to which that sector’s UK presence will decline without passporting – predictions vary, but I’ve yet to see one that predicts no loss to elsewhere. That’s something even those who disparage our financial services sector should worry about.

  • The worse case scenario I read recently was the City would lose £20 billion in revenue and the Government £5 billion in tax.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Martin
    Exams have been made easier. The subject matter is much more prescriptive and the breadth of knowledge is more restricted. This was apparent to me when betwee...
  • Chris Moore
    Charley, I haven't "sneered" at anybody, let alone today's school leavers. You have misunderstood where I'm coming from. I merely believe in an empirica...
  • David Raw
    @ Andrew Macgregor, you say ..... “The creation of the Labour Party via trade union representation occurred after the election of the first trade unionist t...
  • Mary ReidMary Reid
    The references to increased pass rates obscure the fact that a far higher proportion of young people are now taking qualifications at 18. I touched on some of t...
  • Joe Bourke
    Sadbh, the Cambridge dictionary defines working class as "a social group that consists of people who earn little money, often being paid only for the hours o...