LibLink: Tavish Scott: One party rule is harming Holyrood

This week, Holyrood’s Presiding Officer Tricia Marwick put forward proposals which she said would strengthen the Parliament’s role in holding the Scottish Government to account as the Herald reports:

Under her plan, conveners of Holyrood’s 20 committees would be elected by their fellow MSPs, rather than installed by their party chiefs.

The move, which would be one of the most far-reaching reforms of the Parliament since its creation in 1999, would help remove party politics from the often sensitive work of committees, she believes.

Ms Marwick also threatened to put time limits on exchanges at First Minister’s Questions.

Trouble is, her proposals kind of depend on no one party having a majority, unlike the current situation.

Tavish Scott noticed that, and wrote a response in the Scotsman about how one-party rule is harming the Scottish Parliament.

The Presiding Officer now proposes that Holyrood committee conveners could be elected by the whole parliament and not appointed by their parties. It is a reasonable idea. But only if parliament was to forget politics on the day of these elections, and that seems unlikely. Currently, parties are allocated conveners in proportion to their seats in parliament. That is a fair principle. Marwick proposes retaining that. A party then chooses a particular MSP to chair a committee. Instead, Marwick wants the entire parliament to vote in each convener. In the current parliament, that would enshrine power in the hands of the SNP whips and in reality, that means Alex Salmond. Nothing happens in parliament without Salmond’s assent. The SNP controls parliamentary business, votes and the timetabling of legislation. That is what one-party rule means. Marwick now proposes that a majority government would in effect appoint conveners of committees, thus enshrining patronage and loyalty. A minority or coalition government might ensure a more open contest.

You can read the whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • James Hill
    Dear Chris, as others have pointed out, you seem to have missed the fundamental detail of the PM’s proposal as it retains a link to earnings, but instead of a...
  • Richard Wingfield
    I don't understand those points at all, Jason. First, the Greens aren't winning seats off the Lib Dems in Southwark. At the local elections in the borough in Ma...
  • David Warren
    The first step has to be to take the profit motive out of the system. As a family carer for several years I witnessed companies trying to squeeze every last ...
  • Rif Winfield
    First let me say that I've been campaigning for STV elections for over half a century (February 1974 is when I initiated the Liberal Action Group for Electoral ...
  • Jason Connor
    Try and listen to Sharon Graham's speech, the Unite General Secretary at their conference. Now that's what I call a radical progressive speech, not Andy Burnham...