Liz Barker is up for a Pink News award for Parliamentary speech of the year – vote today!

In June, we brought you Liz Barker’s moving speech on the Same Sex Marriage Bill. Liz started by talking about her own relationship which is as long as mine, yet she hasn’t been able to get married to her partner in the same way as I did to mine 25 years ago. Her speech very carefully and without rancour demolished the usual arguments against. She said:

Some noble Lords say that allowing gay people to get married is unfair as it leaves other sorts of relationships, such as those of siblings, without the same legal rights as those who choose a marital status.

If enabling gay marriage will be unfair to a relationship, for example between two sisters, then existing marriage laws are equally wrong and unfair. Opponents of gay marriage never make that argument.

But, my Lords, relationships which adults enter into voluntarily are wholly distinct from relationships determined by consanguinity. If family members could become civil partners, it would be easy for a bullying parent or sibling to place members of their family into a partnership, or prevent them forming a partnership of their choice, simply in order to protect property. Nobody should want to legislate for that.

A great deal has been made of the issue of a conscience clause for registrars and other public servants. My Lords, I grew up in a time and a place when discrimination in public services on the basis of a person’s religion was not uncommon. It caused resentment and divided communities.

The idea that individual public servants should decide according to their personal beliefs who does and does not receive a public service is quite wrong. Taxes are levied on a non-discriminatory basis – and services should be provided on a non-discriminatory basis.

Liz’s speech has been rewarded with a nomination for Parliamentary Speech of the Year by Pink News. And, the good news is, the public get to vote. She’s up against some really good speeches. In particular, I found David Lammy’s very passionate, but I’m voting for Liz. I am a bit surprised that Julian Huppert didn’t get a nod for his eloquent description of the problems faced by transgender people.

You can cast your vote here.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Matthew Huntbach 2nd Oct '13 - 10:44am


    Her speech very carefully and without rancour demolished the usual arguments against.

    No it doesn’t. It shows the usual misunderstanding and misrepresentation of those arguments.

  • nuclear cockroach 2nd Oct '13 - 11:11am

    @Matthew Huntbach

    The argument at its core concerns who may the define the meaning of the word marriage. A minority insist that the authority resides in a religious tradition, whilst a majority insist that the authority resides in the mores and norms of civil society.

    I don’t even know why the subject is being raised again – the battle has already been won and lost.

  • Matthew Huntbach 2nd Oct '13 - 3:50pm

    nuclear cockroach

    I don’t even know why the subject is being raised again – the battle has already been won and lost.

    Yes, I agree. It wasn’t me that raised it.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 4th Jul - 5:27pm
    @ Martin, and Alex Macfie So everything was OK between 2010-15 ? Or is it a case of 'Shush, not in front of the children,...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 4th Jul - 5:03pm
    @ George Kendal, To be fair to you, I don't remember you actually directing term "deficit denier" at me personally. What I found annoying was...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 4th Jul - 4:44pm
    @ Alex McFie, " yes, and voted Tory in 2015 because they thought that was the best way of continuing the Coalition" Well, possibly, but...
  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 4th Jul - 4:31pm
    @Martin: "If questions arise about the Coalition," then engaging in such questions, whatever the answer given, will just result in more questions about it. Saying...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 4th Jul - 4:20pm
    "It has been reported by workers that many Leicester factories continued operating throughout the lockdown. The principal cause was sustained orders, primarily from the biggest...
  • User AvatarMartin 4th Jul - 4:00pm
    Alex Macfie: If questions arise about the Coalition, it is the other way around, someone who was a minister has the authority to rebuff wrong...