Lord Robin Teverson writes…Infrastructure Bill delivers a cluster of Liberal Democrat priorities

House of Lords. Photo: Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of ParliamentA very Liberal Democrat bill got its second reading in the Lords yesterday – the Infrastructure Bill.  Lib Dems have already driven through this Parliament an Energy Act which will not just make sure that when it comes to energy infrastructure the lights stay one but that we decarbonise our energy supply.  We’ve been rolling out super fast broadband across the British countryside.  Often forgotten we also have a £35 billion railway investment programme over the next five years – and that doesn’t include HS2.

As a Party we understand that long term planned investment in our national infrastructure is an important practical policy goal where past Governments have so often failed. In this bill we move to a highways organisation that is given a long term budget that allows road investment to be planned and delivered effectively and predictably.  This is not a measure to cover our country in Tarmac, but to ensure that what we do build is part of a credible strategic programme.

As far as our housing stock is concerned the bill ensures that future homes are built to a zero carbon standard – with a provision that some of those carbon mitigation measures can be off site.  We will have to make sure that those provisions are not abused to circumvent the objective, but this is a great step forward.  It has been clear since the birth of the Coalition in 2010 that Eric Pickles wanted to trash the 2016 target for true carbon neutral homes. This bill ensures that the Tories are thwarted.  The outcome in the bill is not perfect, but we will be pressing to remove the exclusion for small developments when we get to committee stage.

Fracking can be difficult for some Lib Dems, and the bill will allow has extraction to take place deep underground people’s properties.  What is exciting is that this will also act as a big boost to geothermal energy that uses similar technology, but provides a completely renewable and non-intermittent form of energy.

Staying on the energy theme we have a policy win by insisting that renewable energy schemes are open to investment by local people and communities – they can take a share in the ownership and the profits.

In the Lords the bill is being lead by our own Transport Minister Susan Kramer.  There are areas still to improve, but this bill is set to deliver a cluster of Lib Dem priorities.

* Robin Teverson is a Liberal Democrat member of the House of Lords.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Tony Greaves 19th Jun '14 - 3:17pm

    The fracking stuff may end up in the Bill but it is not there at the moment.


  • The immediate opposition seems to be on measures concerning public lands . The rallying to oppose call is posted below. What is in fact prosed in the bill and are these legitimate concerns?

    The Bill proposes that the Secretary of State can hand over any amount of public land to the arms-length, non-departmental Government body, the Homes & Communities Agency. The HCA can then dispose of it to developers. There will be no need to go through local authority planning processes – the Sec of State can give the green light without any local politicians or planners’ involvement, just by consulting a panel of two people.
    As for public rights of way, the proposed law allows any of them to be extinguished. There is no need for permission for easements (ie roads, powerlines, railways. drilling, tunnels, etc). And any existing laws that protects land and prevents it being built on, appear to be overriden by one simple enabling clause (see http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/lbill/2014-2015/0002/lbill_2014-20150002_en_7.htm#sch3

  • David Evershed 19th Jun '14 - 5:54pm

    Not all government spending labelled ‘infrastructure’ is necessarily good.

    Investment spending should both show sufficient benefit for the spending and not damage the ecology unnecessarily.

    Unfortunately HS2 does not meet the minimum benefit to cost ratio and alternative routes which avoid ploughing through muliple ancient woodlands have been ignored.

    UKIP is the only party opposed to HS2 and as a consequence will pick up votes in the many constituencies along the route.

  • Adrian Cruden 2nd Jul '14 - 8:49am

    The Infrastructure Bill contains a clause which will allow ALL public land to be privatised. There’s no need to reference the Forestry Act 1967, the Countryside Rights of Way Act or any other protective law, because Schedule 3 of the Bill- states that “the property, rights and liabilities that may be transferred by a scheme include… property, rights and liabilities that would not otherwise be capable of being transferred or assigned.”

    In plain English, this means all preceding regulations, legislation and other protections for this site are null and void – fill your boots.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 16th Jul - 4:52pm
    Come on, folks. Surely we’ve ‘done’ school uniforms by now. Is this REALLY the most important education question of the moment. What about getting stuck...
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 16th Jul - 4:39pm
    @Peter Martin Those of us who support a Federal State - and knowing your views on the possible direction of travel of the dreaded EU,...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 16th Jul - 4:37pm
    Rob Cannon. What you say does not in the slightest detract from my experience in Wales. I suspect that if it was now suggested scrapping...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 16th Jul - 4:23pm
    We need Allies because we are averaging 18% in recent Polls while our Twin Enemies, Labour & Tories are both around 24%. Its not a...
  • User AvatarSue Sutherland 16th Jul - 4:12pm
    Richard I’m not sure what you mean about 110,000 members not all of whom will have the “exact beliefs and lifestyle that we would like.”...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 16th Jul - 4:02pm
    If we really believed in our Constitution we would be campaigning against compulsory uniforms altogether, first because they are Compulsory & second because they are...