Ludovic Kennedy: a man who just missed becoming Liberal leader

For many years Adrian Slade has interviewed prominent Liberal Democrats. To mark his recent decision to make his archive of the interview recordings available to researchers and other interested parties, Lib Dem Voice is running a selection of his write-ups of interviews from over the years. The latest is with broadcaster, writer and twice Liberal candidate Sir Ludovic Kennedy from 2003.

In the 1959 general election just 2,000 votes separated Ludovic Kennedy from becoming Liberal MP for Rochdale, and possibly a future party leader.

The party he joined in 1956 had all but heard its death knell at the previous election, but the subsequent emergence of Jo Grimond as its new leader had re-vitalised the near corpse and, with the help of the Suez crisis, begun to attract some prominent supporters.  Among them were two already known broadcasters, Robin Day and Ludovic Kennedy.

“Yes. It was Jo Grimond who first stirred my interest in party politics” says Kennedy without hesitation.  “Jo, when he said things, lightened up the whole world so I knew this was the mast to which I could nail my colours.”

Ludovic Kennedy was already a household name – as a principal newscaster for the then fledgling ITV network and also as a leading campaigner against miscarriage of justice. He had championed, and eventually helped to prove, the innocence of Timothy Evans. Evans had been wrongly hanged in 1951 for a murder committed by Rillington Place killer, Christie.

Kennedy was also married to a famous, and beautiful, ballerina and film actress, Moira Shearer, so he was the ideal high-profile candidate to fight a by-election if one came along.

But where had his Liberalism come from? He was an Etonian by education, and he had had an impressive war record. Was it from his up-bringing, his naval experience or was he, as Roy Jenkins described himself, an instinctive liberal?

“Definitely an instinctive liberal, and also an instinctive democrat, as Roy was,” he says.

“I couldn’t be anything else. My upbringing wasn’t important at all. Far from it in fact. After my father retired from the navy he had been in all his life he became a Conservative agent, so I was brought up at Conservative fetes and things like that. And the navy was not an influence either … we didn’t talk politics. We were just there for the war. One thing that did confirm me in my Liberalism was Anthony Eden’s disastrous foray at Suez. That was an issue that made me very angry,” he says.

So, when the opportunity to stand in a by-election in Rochdale was offered to him in 1958 he had no difficulty in accepting, and he came less than 4000 votes short of beating Labour in what had previously been a Conservative seat. He must have had a good organisation?

“Oh yes, we did. Rochdale was an old Liberal town and they had a very good local Association they called the Rochdale Reform Association – they always used the word Reform rather than Liberal. I had a very good agent and there was a curious man who came down from headquarters called Dominic Lefoe. He was a great rabble-rouser. He organised soapbox meetings and things. We also got a good deal of help from outside. I did a lot of village hall meetings and we put round leaflets on thrilling subjects like site value taxation and the abolition of something called Schedule A – I can’t remember what that was now.”

Not quite like today’s by-elections but undoubtedly effective, and the result was even improved upon in the general election of the following year.  By that time Ludovic Kennedy was also presenting ITV’s flagship current affairs programme This Week. Looking back on his 2,000 vote near miss, how much had he really wanted to win?`

“I have often asked myself that,” he said. “If I had won, I would have accepted it, but my career would certainly have been very different.”

In that same election Robin Day fought and failed to win Hereford. Unlike Ludovic Kennedy, he subsequently left the party altogether. Was he an instinctive Liberal like Kennedy himself?

“I think he thought he was, and he did admire Jo Grimond, but in fact he was a deep-rooted Conservative,” says Kennedy with a large smile.

Within a year they had both joined the BBC’s Panorama team and for Ludovic Kennedy, apart from a brief period as candidate for South Bucks, party politics took a back seat.

“It was then that I realised that it was not really on for me and that I wanted to be a writer and a broadcaster.”

Nevertheless he re-emerged powerfully during the 1966 general election, writing and presenting the Liberal party’s controversial political broadcasts. “One of them, attacking Harold Wilson, did achieve particular acclaim’ he remembers. ‘Can the leopard change his (Socialist) spots?’ was the theme.”

With his journalistic as well as political perspective how had he viewed the Grimond decade?

“I just accepted that the Liberals were a small party and likely to remain so, but it didn’t change my allegiance in any way. It was often said of Jo Grimond that he was the best Prime Minister we never had and he would have been because he was exactly the same in public life as he was privately. There was no dichotomy.”

He still rates Grimond very highly, although he also has warm words for Jeremy Thorpe. “He was wonderful until he crashed. He was a born politician and it was a tragedy that the one thing he lived for he could no longer do.”

When he and his family returned to its roots in Scotland in 1966, Kennedy’s Liberal loyalties became rather more stretched. Unlike the Scottish Liberal Party, he believed, and still does today, in an independent Scotland. He never joined the Scottish Nationalists but he spoke for their candidates on one or two occasions, when there was no Liberal standing.

“Yes I spoke for Winnie Ewing in the Hamilton by-election” – a famous Scot Nat victory in 1967.

He is not over-impressed by today’s devolution to a Scottish parliament which he clearly considers a half measure. “I still believe that if Denmark can run its own affairs, why can’t Scotland?” he says.

However, he has never deviated in his overall support for the Liberals and now Liberal Democrats. In ’83, if he had not been moving south again, he might well have been persuaded by David Steel to stand again as a candidate (in Edinburgh), and he found no difficulty in supporting the merger with the Social Democrats in 1988.

“I had always thought that David Owen was a bit of a busted flush but with instinctive liberals and democrats like Roy, Shirley and Bill Rodgers, I thought the prospects were good.”

Party politics have never dominated Kennedy’s life. First and foremost he has been a writer and broadcaster who has used his considerable skills to campaign vigorously on issues he cares deeply about – miscarriage of justice for Timothy Evans, the Birmingham Six, the Guildford Four, Sally Clark and others, and his continuing efforts to relax the laws on euthanasia (“it’s coming. It’s a worldwide movement now. People in this country think that it is all right to help people die slowly but immoral to help them die quickly’). But he has been an important source of personal support to three Liberal leaders and to Roy Jenkins, as Liberal Democrat leader in the Lords. “Roy was kind enough to put me forward for a peerage but Paddy Ashdown turned the idea down,” Kennedy adds without bitterness.

For all that he may still differ from it on the Scottish issue, the party can count itself lucky to have had him on its side.

* Mark Pack is Party President and Co-leader of the party. He is editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • toryboysnevergrowup 9th May '12 - 12:56pm

    “and he came less than 4000 votes short of beating Labour”

    No he didn’t he lost by over by over 4,500 votes and he came 2,730 short in the subsequent General Election. That said he was a good man, as was Jack McCann who beat him on both occasions, which is a lot more than can be said for the subsequent impostor and spokesman for the asbestos industy who would have loved this Coalition with his Tory friends. The present state of the LibDems in Rochdale attests to what the good people of Rochdale think about the modern day sucessors of Ludo and John Bright.

  • Matthew Huntbach 13th May '12 - 2:39pm


    ” I did a lot of village hall meetings and we put round leaflets on thrilling subjects like site value taxation and the abolition of something called Schedule A – I can’t remember what that was now.”

    It’s tax on imputed income from owner occupation, it was abolished in 1963.

    Up till that time if you owned the property you lived in, you were deemed in effect to be “renting it to yourself” and therefore had to pay income tax on that rent – at market value. It seems incredible now, when the tiniest suggestion of some sort of property tax, such as the “mansion tax” brings howls of anguish, but income tax on imputed rental was an established part of UK taxation up till less than 50 years ago. Perhaps it was easier to accept when most people rented their homes.

    Abolition of Schedule A income tax and support for Site Value taxation seem contradictory, since both are a form of property taxation. I’m not sure if Liberals at the time saw these two policies as a balance, but it makes sense to do so. So the abolition of Schedule A without the introduction of Site Value taxation created an imbalance we still have today.

  • toryboysnevergrowup 15th May '12 - 3:08pm

    Michael Hall

    Have a look at the Council elections, to say nothing of not a few local defections. 5 councillors for a party that use to control the council until recently says something.

  • Richard Underhill 23rd May '16 - 3:12pm

    Suez was important because invading Egypt was unwise, because Prime Minister Antony Eden was accused of lying to Parliament, suffered ill health and retired, because it happened during a US Presidential election without US support, because it led to downwards pressure on the pound, because the Fourth Republic in France became a founder member of what is now the EU and prospered accordingly. The UK did not.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 3rd Jun - 1:11pm
    ‘Differing’? Bloody predictive text! It should, of course, have been ‘suffering’.
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 3rd Jun - 1:09pm
    @Joseph Bourke There’s also a fairly long clip of him around 1937 paying tribute to his long differing wife, I think, at his (Golden?) Wedding....
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 3rd Jun - 1:03pm
    Peter Marin, Sky news had a program last night on the econony after the pandemic that featured former BP boss Lord Browne, Nobel prize-winning economist...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 3rd Jun - 12:42pm
    David Raw, it depends what you mean by declining health. Lloyd George's wit may not have been as sharp as it was in his prime,...
  • User AvatarJohn Probert 3rd Jun - 12:32pm
    William Francis: "Much of our more radical policies such as the co-partneship in industry ideas promulgated by the party in the 1960s and 1970s, have...
  • User AvatarBarry Lofty 3rd Jun - 12:20pm
    If the Liberal Democrats cannot get their message out there to the British electorate in the midst of this truly awful government then we might...