A postal referendum is currently taking place on proposals for a Manchester congestion charge, with the ballot closing on 11 December. The campaign has reached YouTube as this clip shows (and it’s a typical sign of the times that people’s reaction to the events in the clip is to whip out their mobile phones to take photos):
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- The liberalism we need: a platform for people to thrive and live their version of a best life
- Britain has too much government and too little democratic power
- Mathew on Monday: It’s time to take big money out of British politics
- Observations of an Expat: West Bank Settler Sanctions
- Sarah Olney bids to become candidate for Mayor of London
Search
Op-eds
-
Are the men of violence back in British politics? (Chris Nelson)
-
London needs more social homes – and Liberal Democrat boroughs are determined to deliver (Gareth Roberts)
-
Andy Burnham’s devolution reforms go only half-way (Mark Corner)
-
Reform donations row shows how facts get trampled at Westminster (David Vigar)
-
The Independent View: Turning back the tide on free speech (Jack Coulson)
-
Whatever happened to Connie Converse?
-
Council to help people 'correctly identify' potholes
-
'Over me beat the invisible wings'- Ireland, Churchill and Lloyd George
-
How many councillors has Reform UK lost since the May 2026 elections?
-
Lord Bonkers' Diary: Wah-wah brass and boings on the timpani
-
Elvis Costello: The Other Side of Summer
-
Government must do more to help people onto the housing ladder
Recent Comments
Peter Davies
There is a general problem that all parties state their targets in terms of new homes built. While regeneration programs replacing bad homes with better ones is...- Peter Davies
As usual, the article talks about a requirement for social homes and "genuinely affordable homes" but a strategy for delivering "affordable homes". We need to b... 
Tristan Ward
"The question on Monday evening is whether we should be as wary of it in private hands" Of course we should. We don't like anyone or anything that abuses pow...
Pawel Urbanski
Gareth, thank you for this. Housing is one of the issues raised most often on the doorstep in London, and this is what Lib Dems in action looks like: Richmond, ...
David Moon
We keep obsessing about the National Debt and fiscal rules, when the real weakness of the economy is our trade imbalance with the rest of the world, particularl...
6 Comments
There is also a video on the 21st Century Transport website- http://www.21centurytransport.com
Nice video, but I’m afraid it won’t persuade me, or most other Lib Dems round my way that this congestion charge is a good idea.
The world’s largest charging zone (by a long way) will make people outside the M60 ring road pay for public transport improvements that are nearly all inside, so they don’t benefit us or give us alternatives to driving.
The real message to most people outside the charging zone is “you pay, you get even worse traffic”. Good deal.
And, of course, the “Yes” campaign is all publically funded, but the Councils are forbidden from funding the “no” campaign. Level playing field, anyone?
I’ve delivered over a thousand “NO” leaflets over the last couple of weeks and I’m reasonably confident that we’ll win and pro-charge Labour will lose.
I hope the “yes” vote wins. We need to promote public transport use by any means possible.
The car won’t get you very far when the M60 is a bumper-to-bumper traffic jam
How is making people pay to cross the M60 by car and then not providing public transport alternatives promoting public transport? It’s just making people pay.
Liam,
Why would the M60 have bumper-to-bumper traffic jams?
The CONgestion charge will make things far worse outside the zone and might even make your prediction come true with everyone driving round the M60 to avoid going into the charging zone.
Public transport is not the great enabler you think. For most people’s journeys, personal transport in the form of a car is by far the most environmentally friendly and efficient option.
The video is pretty but says nothing. THe we vote ‘Yes’ campaign has been poor, the posters with selfish people explaining why they are alright jack seems to sum up the reson for a yes vote.
It hurts the professional people and causes an econmic headache.
A ‘NO’ vote does not mean we are against public transport but the TIF bochure is at best misleading, we could say it’s a big lie.
The traffic levels in Manchester have fallen nearly 10% in 10 years so why attack the private motorist? The revenue promised in the brochure simply is not achievable without a huge increase in cars from hte current level. The adverse effect on the economy is scary and the environmental impact could be adverse.
There are some very easy wins yet instead we are being forced into the very expensive plan in the TIF brochure. I’ve looked and almost £900,000,000 of the £1.1bn loan is being allocated to spending on items that will not add one train, bus, tram or add any roadspace whatsoever.
Vote No for me.