Martin Horwood writes … Much more than a number

School visit re FGM

Baroness Lindsay Northover, Baroness Jenny Randerson and Lynne Featherstone MP at a school visit to talk about FGM

As the only UK party with internationalism at our heart, Lib Dems should be very proud of being part of the first government to spend 0.7% of national income on helping the poorest and most vulnerable people in the world, a target set by the international community forty years ago and one that many politicians over the years have disregarded as unobtainable.

Irate Tory rightwingers often criticise it as a number plucked out of the air.  It’s not true.  0.72% was proposed to the UN in 1968 by the Dutch economist Jan Tinbergen, who shortly afterwards won the Nobel Prize for Economics for his pioneering work in macroeconomic modelling. It was later refined to 0.70%.

But rows about how much the UK government should be spending on international aid can obscure the reality of what the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) is doing on the ground in developing countries.  We can easily forget that this is so much more than simply patting ourselves on the back for being the first developed country to reach a particular percentage target.

Take the work of Lynne Featherstone and Lindsay Northover, our former and current Lib Dem ministers in DFID, to end Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). According to the World Health Organisation there are as many as 125 million women alive today who have been cut, and who are living with the physical and psychological scars of this horrific tradition. Despite the enormous scale of this problem, FGM received little attention from government and was little known to most people outside of specific charities working on the issue. First Lynne, and now Lindsay, have been incredibly successful in forcing this up the political agenda, not just domestically but internationally.  So successful that Tory ministers now rush to publicly support the campaign – witness David Cameron’s welcome appearance at the Girls Summit last summer.

Labour rather grudgingly welcome this high-profile focus while complaining at how few prosecutions have taken place in the UK.  Quite apart from forgetting their own record in government, this rather misses the point.  Julia Lalla-Maharajh, of the fantastically successful African anti-cutting campaign the Orchid Project, has engaged with DFID and the Home Office, showing them that ultimately anti-FGM campaigns succeed by changing not just the hearts and minds of women and girls, but the hearts and minds of entire traditional communities. This approach takes long-term commitment, but the end result is invaluable.

Today is International Day of Zero Tolerance for FGM.  It will be promoted on Twitter, in Newspapers, even on TV news. It is undoubtedly the Liberal Democrats in government who have helped to put this on the agenda and bring it to worldwide attention and made possible  DFID’s £35 million FGM programme with the potential to prevent millions of girls being subject to this brutal crime in the future.

Campaigns like this one are why our country’s international aid budget is so important, and why DFID has such a fantastic reputation worldwide. 0.7% is so much more than a number.  It represents lives saved, abuse stopped, diseases prevented, and that’s why our party should be so proud of it and defend it against who choose not to understand.


* Martin Horwood was LibDem MP for Cheltenham 2005-15 and international affairs spokesperson for the parliamentary party. He is currently chairing the party’s national policy working group on Britain’s Place in the World but is writing in a personal capacity.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Eddie Sammon 6th Feb '15 - 3:07pm

    I want to see some hard headed action on preventing FGM, including prosecuting parents, but I do feel that issues with a human enemy need to be spoken about differently than one with mainly an illness as an enemy, such as cancer or mental health campaigns.

    We need to be very careful about facts when dealing with human enemies and prosecutions.

  • David Cooper 6th Feb '15 - 6:01pm

    @Lib Dems should be very proud of being part of the first government to spend 0.7% of national income on helping the poorest and most vulnerable people in the world,

    We can only be proud if the money is effectively spent and really does help the poorest. There is strong evidence that it is badly spent, and ends up in the pockets of the very rich. A recent reports of the Public Accounts Committee showed that millions had gone to one of the richest individuals in Nigeria (Guardian, 29 Jan). Giving away millions of taxpayers money to criminals should be a matter of deep shame, not a matter for witless celebration.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 21st Jan - 12:38pm
    MPs would be absolutely mad to put no deal on a ballot, and the EU will not grant an extension for such a crazy purpose....
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 21st Jan - 12:18pm
    Joseph Bourke, the only somewhat beneficial Brexit resolution is its cancellation, the sooner the better. Consequently, compensating public "investment" might have some payback only in...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 21st Jan - 12:02pm
    Arnold, point taken that public investment cannot of itself resolve the structural damage to the economy that Brexit would involve. But what we are talking...
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 21st Jan - 11:50am
    Peter Martin, the Berlin example supports my viewpoint. Bonn continues to do ok as part of the old "rheinischer Kapitalismus" area, while Berlin continues to...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 21st Jan - 11:36am
    PeterMartin, economic growth athough slowing over the longer term has a relatively consistent trend of a little over 2%. Investment spending and spending on public...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 21st Jan - 11:25am
    @David Beckett You can blame Sir Winston Churchill for that. When the House of Commons was bombed in WW2, it was the Government that he...